Post J C, Preston R A, Aul J J, Larkins-Pettigrew M, Rydquist-White J, Anderson K W, Wadowsky R M, Reagan D R, Walker E S, Kingsley L A, Magit A E, Ehrlich G D
Department of Otolaryngology, University of Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
JAMA. 1995;273(20):1598-604.
To determine if the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) can detect bacterial DNA in pediatric middle ear effusions that are sterile by standard cultural methods.
Single-center, blinded, comparative study of diagnostic assays. The PCR-based detection systems for Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae, and Streptococcus pneumoniae were designed and validated using a battery of DNAs obtained from cultured bacteria. Chronic middle ear effusion specimens were collected and comparatively analyzed by culture and the PCR.
Tertiary care pediatric hospital.
A total of 97 middle ear effusions were collected from pediatric outpatients at Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh (Pa) during myringotomy and tube placement for chronic otitis media with effusion (duration > 3 months). All patients had failed multiple courses of antimicrobial therapy and were diagnosed by a combination of validated otoscopy and tympanograms.
Differences in the percentage of positive test results between PCR-based assays and culture for M catarrhalis, H influenzae, and S pneumoniae.
Of the 97 specimens of otitis media with effusion, 28 (28.9%) tested positive by both culture and PCR for M catarrhalis, H influenzae, or S pneumoniae. An additional 47 specimens (48%) were PCR positive/culture negative for these three bacterial species. Thus, 75 (77.3%) of the 97 specimens tested PCR positive for one or more of the three test organisms. The minimum number of bacterial genomic equivalents present in the average culture-negative ear was estimated to be greater than 10(4) based on dilutional experiments.
The PCR-based assay systems can detect the presence of bacterial DNA in a significant percentage of culturally sterile middle ear effusions. While this finding is not proof of an active bacterial infectious process, the large number of bacterial genomic equivalents present in the ears is suggestive of an active process.
确定聚合酶链反应(PCR)能否检测出经标准培养方法显示无菌的小儿中耳积液中的细菌DNA。
诊断检测的单中心、盲法、对比研究。利用从培养细菌中获取的一系列DNA设计并验证了基于PCR的卡他莫拉菌、流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌检测系统。收集慢性中耳积液标本,并通过培养和PCR进行对比分析。
三级护理儿童医院。
在宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡儿童医院,对97例因慢性渗出性中耳炎(病程>3个月)行鼓膜切开置管术的小儿门诊患者收集中耳积液。所有患者多疗程抗菌治疗均无效,通过经验证的耳镜检查和鼓室图联合诊断。
基于PCR的检测方法与卡他莫拉菌、流感嗜血杆菌和肺炎链球菌培养法阳性检测结果百分比的差异。
在97例渗出性中耳炎标本中,28例(28.9%)经培养和PCR检测,卡他莫拉菌、流感嗜血杆菌或肺炎链球菌呈阳性。另外47例标本(48%)这三种细菌经PCR检测为阳性/培养检测为阴性。因此,97例标本中有75例(77.3%)经PCR检测,三种检测菌中的一种或多种呈阳性。基于稀释实验,估计平均培养阴性的耳朵中存在的细菌基因组当量的最小数量大于10⁴。
基于PCR的检测系统能在很大比例的培养无菌的中耳积液中检测出细菌DNA的存在。虽然这一发现不能证明存在活跃的细菌感染过程,但耳朵中存在的大量细菌基因组当量提示存在活跃过程。