Pomelov V S, Kubyshkin V A, Budaev K D, Gordeev V F, Maksiian Iu I, Aruin L I
Khirurgiia (Mosk). 1995 Jan(1):37-40.
The authors analysed the immediate and late results of selective proximal or truncal vagotomy with excision of the ulcer from the gastric lumen or wedge resection of the stomach in patients with various localization of the gastric ulcers. The best results were produced (Visick I-II) in patients after selective proximal vagotomy with excision of the ulcer from the gastric lumen (in 93%), the results were poorer in selective proximal vagotomy with wedge resection of the stomach and in truncal vagotomy with excision of the ulcer or wedge resection of the stomach (only in 20%, 38%, and 30% of patients, respectively). The results were unsatisfactory (Visick IV) mainly after vagotomy with wedge resection of the stomach due to recurrences and postvagotomy functional disorders. The authors claim only limited use of organ-preserving operations to be admissible.
作者分析了在患有不同部位胃溃疡的患者中,进行选择性近端或迷走神经干切断术,并从胃腔切除溃疡或胃楔形切除术的近期和远期结果。在从胃腔切除溃疡的选择性近端迷走神经切断术后的患者中取得了最佳结果(Visick I-II级,93%),而在进行胃楔形切除术的选择性近端迷走神经切断术以及进行溃疡切除或胃楔形切除术的迷走神经干切断术中,结果较差(分别仅为20%、38%和30%的患者)。主要在进行胃楔形切除术的迷走神经切断术后,由于复发和迷走神经切断术后的功能障碍,结果并不理想(Visick IV级)。作者声称仅允许有限地使用保留器官的手术。