Lund G B, Trerotola S O, Scheel P J
Russell Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiologic Sciences, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1995 May;25(5):732-7. doi: 10.1016/0272-6386(95)90549-9.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the percutaneous translumbar approach for long-term hemodialysis catheter access. Seventeen double-lumen hemodialysis catheters were placed percutaneously from the right flank to the inferior vena cava in 12 patients. Catheter placement was successful in all patients. Adequate flow rates were obtained. Seven episodes of thrombosis-related access failure occurred (0.33 episodes/100 days at risk). Two catheters were removed and five catheters were managed with urokinase infusion. Six episodes of infection occurred (0.28 episodes/100 days at risk). Four required catheter removal. Two catheters were removed after defects developed in the catheter. Five catheters were removed electively because catheter hemodialysis was discontinued. Four catheters remained in place. Cumulative patency was 52% at 6 months and 17% at 12 months. Translumbar inferior vena cava hemodialysis catheters represent a valuable alternative in cases in which traditional catheter sites have failed.
本研究的目的是评估经皮腰段入路用于长期血液透析导管置入的情况。在12例患者中,经皮从右侧腰部将17根双腔血液透析导管置入下腔静脉。所有患者导管置入均成功,获得了足够的血流量。发生了7次与血栓形成相关的通路失败事件(每100天风险发作0.33次)。拔除了2根导管,5根导管通过尿激酶输注进行处理。发生了6次感染事件(每100天风险发作0.28次),4次需要拔除导管。2根导管在出现导管缺陷后被拔除。5根导管因停止导管血液透析而被选择性拔除。4根导管仍保留在位。6个月时累积通畅率为52%,12个月时为17%。经腰段下腔静脉血液透析导管在传统导管置入部位失败的情况下是一种有价值的替代方法。