• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关节炎知识问卷。一项用于测量患者对关节炎及其自我管理的知识的测试。

The arthritis knowledge questionnaire. A test for measuring patient knowledge of arthritis and its self-management.

作者信息

Edworthy S M, Devins G M, Watson M M

机构信息

University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Arthritis Rheum. 1995 May;38(5):590-600. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380503.

DOI:10.1002/art.1780380503
PMID:7748213
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop a questionnaire for measuring patients' knowledge about arthritis and its self-management.

METHODS

An initial item pool of 175 multiple-choice questions was developed, based on the Stanford Arthritis Self-Management Program and on basic medical knowledge about arthritis and its management. A rheumatologist, psychologist, physiotherapist, and several lay individuals assessed the questions for content validity, breadth of coverage, and face validity. Patients assessed the questions for comprehensibility. Four subject groups with varying knowledge levels were recruited to answer the entire set of questions. Item analysis was undertaken to develop parallel forms of subtests so that repeated assessments could be undertaken.

RESULTS

The final instrument, the Arthritis Knowledge Questionnaire, consists of 2 tests, each comprising 3 subtests: self-management (15 items), arthritis in general (15 items), and rheumatoid arthritis (11 items).

CONCLUSION

We present psychometric evidence that these parallel forms provide highly reliable and valid estimates of knowledge concerning arthritis and arthritis self-management.

摘要

目的

编制一份用于衡量患者对关节炎及其自我管理知识掌握情况的问卷。

方法

基于斯坦福关节炎自我管理项目以及有关关节炎及其管理的基础医学知识,编制了一个包含175道多项选择题的初始题库。一名风湿病学家、一名心理学家、一名物理治疗师以及几位非专业人士对这些问题进行了内容效度、覆盖广度和表面效度评估。患者对问题的可理解性进行了评估。招募了四个知识水平各异的受试者组来回答整套问题。进行项目分析以编制平行形式的子测验,以便能够进行重复评估。

结果

最终工具《关节炎知识问卷》由2个测试组成,每个测试包含3个子测验:自我管理(15项)、一般关节炎(15项)和类风湿关节炎(11项)。

结论

我们提供了心理测量学证据,表明这些平行形式能够高度可靠且有效地评估有关关节炎及关节炎自我管理的知识。

相似文献

1
The arthritis knowledge questionnaire. A test for measuring patient knowledge of arthritis and its self-management.关节炎知识问卷。一项用于测量患者对关节炎及其自我管理的知识的测试。
Arthritis Rheum. 1995 May;38(5):590-600. doi: 10.1002/art.1780380503.
2
The arthritic patients' perspective of measuring treatment efficacy: Patient Reported Experience Measures (PREMs) as a quality tool.关节炎患者对治疗效果的评估:患者报告的体验测量(PREMs)作为一种质量工具。
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;32(4):547-52. Epub 2014 Jun 30.
3
Development of an instrument to measure knowledge in individuals with rheumatoid arthritis: the ACREU rheumatoid arthritis knowledge questionnaire.类风湿关节炎患者知识测量工具的开发:ACREU类风湿关节炎知识问卷
J Rheumatol. 1997 Apr;24(4):647-53.
4
Development and Validity Testing of an Arthritis Self-Management Assessment Tool.一种关节炎自我管理评估工具的开发与效度测试
Orthop Nurs. 2018 Jan/Feb;37(1):24-35. doi: 10.1097/NOR.0000000000000415.
5
Development of a questionnaire (OPQ) to assess patient's knowledge about osteoporosis.开发一份用于评估患者骨质疏松症知识的问卷(OPQ)。
Maturitas. 2000 Dec 29;37(2):75-81. doi: 10.1016/s0378-5122(00)00165-1.
6
The Leuven questionnaire on patient knowledge of chemotherapy (L-PaKC): instrument development and psychometric evaluation.鲁汶化疗患者知识问卷(L-PaKC):工具开发与心理计量评估。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013 Aug;17(4):465-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2012.10.012. Epub 2012 Dec 1.
7
Brazil Patient Knowledge Questionnaire (PKQ) and evaluation of disease-specific knowledge in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.巴西患者知识问卷(PKQ)与类风湿性关节炎患者疾病特异性知识评估
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2006 Sep-Oct;24(5):521-8.
8
Development of a functional disability measurement tool to assess early arthritis: the Recent-Onset Arthritis Disability (ROAD) questionnaire.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005 Sep-Oct;23(5):628-36.
9
Knowledge gaps in patients with atrial fibrillation revealed by a new validated knowledge questionnaire.一项新的经过验证的知识问卷揭示的房颤患者知识缺口。
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Nov 15;223:906-914. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.08.303. Epub 2016 Aug 21.
10
Development of an item bank to measure factual disease and treatment related knowledge of rheumatoid arthritis patients in the treat to target era.开发一个项目库,以衡量靶向治疗时代类风湿关节炎患者的疾病和治疗相关的事实知识。
Patient Educ Couns. 2018 Jan;101(1):67-73. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2017.07.019. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Assessing Patients' Knowledge on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Validation of the ERIC CLL Knowledge Questionnaire in Greece.评估患者对慢性淋巴细胞白血病的认知:希腊版ERIC CLL知识问卷的验证
Hemasphere. 2021 Feb 23;5(3):e546. doi: 10.1097/HS9.0000000000000546. eCollection 2021 Mar.
2
Two parallel short forms to measure disease- and treatment-associated knowledge in rheumatoid arthritis: application of item response theory.两种用于测量类风湿关节炎中疾病和治疗相关知识的平行简表:项目反应理论的应用
Rheumatol Adv Pract. 2020 Jun 17;4(2):rkaa012. doi: 10.1093/rap/rkaa012. eCollection 2020.
3
The relationship among health literacy, health knowledge, and adherence to treatment in patients with rheumatoid arthritis.
类风湿关节炎患者的健康素养、健康知识与治疗依从性之间的关系。
HSS J. 2013 Feb;9(1):42-9. doi: 10.1007/s11420-012-9308-6. Epub 2012 Dec 11.
4
Adaptation of the methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis knowledge questionnaire (MiRAK) for use with parents of children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a qualitative study.类风湿关节炎甲氨蝶呤知识问卷(MiRAK)在幼年特发性关节炎患儿父母中应用的适应性:一项定性研究。
Pediatr Rheumatol Online J. 2013 Jul 3;11(1):27. doi: 10.1186/1546-0096-11-27.
5
Needs and preferences regarding health care delivery as perceived by patients with systemic sclerosis.系统性硬化症患者对医疗服务的需求和偏好。
Clin Rheumatol. 2011 Jun;30(6):815-24. doi: 10.1007/s10067-010-1645-6. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
6
Development and validation of Fibromyalgia Knowledge Questionnaire: FKQ.纤维肌痛知识问卷(FKQ)的编制与验证。
Rheumatol Int. 2012 Mar;32(3):655-62. doi: 10.1007/s00296-010-1627-7. Epub 2010 Dec 5.
7
The development and validation of a Low Back Pain Knowledge Questionnaire - LKQ.腰痛知识问卷(LKQ)的编制与验证。
Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2009;64(12):1167-75. doi: 10.1590/S1807-59322009001200006.