Mathys W
Institut für Hygiene, Westfälischen Wilhelms-Universität Münster.
Zentralbl Hyg Umweltmed. 1994 Dec;196(4):338-59.
The research objective of this study is to monitor the degree of pesticide pollution in public drinking waters and to characterise the pathways by which these substances get into potable waters. Public drinking waters, raw waters, ground waters, and surface waters in an area with intensive agriculture were analysed for pesticides and nitrate during the years 1987-1992. The monitoring reveals that only potable waters of water works using the process of artificial ground water recharge are polluted by pesticides. The very influence of surface water on the degree of pesticide contamination can be shown up to the wells. Wells that are influenced by bank filtration or infiltration contain significantly (P < 0.001) higher amounts and a greater number of substances than pure ground water wells. Most often triazines and phenylureas are analysed. Among the tested water works the artificial ground water recharge is the main factor for the input of pesticides into the aquifer and the drinking water. Percolation experiments, and parallel seasonal changes of pesticides and nitrate in raw and infiltration water document a high mobility during the subsoil passage and an easy vulnerability of the aquifer. There is no correlation between pesticides and nitrate. So nitrates are not suited as an indicator for pesticide pollution. Almost all tested surface waters, including channels, contain pesticides in highly varying concentrations during the whole year and are thus always a possible source for an input into the recharged ground water. In addition to agricultural runoffs a remarkable contamination of rivers with the herbicide diuron caused by municipal waste waters can be observed in the summer. Because of insufficient elimination of herbicides like triazines and phenylureas during bank filtration or infiltration and because of the high loads of surface waters with pesticides a minimisation of pesticide losses within the whole catchment area, especially of runoffs into surface waters, and the abstention from the use of slowly degradable herbicides in cities, on railways or in private gardens are inevitable. At the present time, however, a protection of ground and public drinking water from pesticide contamination can only be achieved by treating surface or ground waters with activated carbon.
本研究的目的是监测公共饮用水中的农药污染程度,并确定这些物质进入饮用水的途径。在1987 - 1992年期间,对农业密集地区的公共饮用水、原水、地下水和地表水进行了农药和硝酸盐分析。监测显示,只有采用人工回灌地下水工艺的水厂的饮用水受到农药污染。地表水对农药污染程度的影响一直延伸到水井。受岸边过滤或渗透影响的水井所含物质的数量和种类比纯地下水井显著(P < 0.001)更多。最常检测到的是三嗪类和苯基脲类。在所测试的水厂中,人工回灌地下水是农药进入含水层和饮用水的主要因素。渗流实验以及原水和渗透水中农药与硝酸盐的平行季节性变化表明,这些物质在土壤下层具有高迁移性,且含水层易受污染。农药与硝酸盐之间没有相关性。因此,硝酸盐不适宜作为农药污染的指标。几乎所有测试的地表水,包括渠道,全年都含有浓度变化很大的农药,因此始终是回灌地下水的潜在污染源。除了农业径流外,夏季还可观察到城市污水导致河流中除草剂敌草隆的显著污染。由于在岸边过滤或渗透过程中,三嗪类和苯基脲类等除草剂去除不充分,且地表水中农药负荷较高,因此在整个集水区内尽量减少农药流失,特别是减少径流进入地表水,并避免在城市、铁路沿线或私人花园中使用降解缓慢的除草剂是不可避免的。然而,目前只有通过用活性炭处理地表水或地下水才能保护地下水和公共饮用水免受农药污染。