• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项使用地标任务对半侧空间忽视的调查。

An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the Landmark Task.

作者信息

Harvey M, Milner A D, Roberts R C

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of St Andrews, Scotland.

出版信息

Brain Cogn. 1995 Feb;27(1):59-78. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1995.1004.

DOI:10.1006/brcg.1995.1004
PMID:7748546
Abstract

The "Landmark Task" is designed to tease apart two major factors in determining line bisection errors in spatial neglect: one whose general nature is perceptual, the other whose nature is motor. On critical test trials, the subject is required to point to whichever end of a mid-transected line is judged as nearer to the transection. Seven out of eight neglect patients pointed consistently to the left end of such lines. Thus their misjudgments were made in the direction opposite to any putative "directional hypokinesia." One patient, however, pointed predominantly rightward on these test trials. Normal controls and unilateral stroke patients were also tested on the Landmark Task. Cueing of one end of a line led to a relative perceptual overestimation of that half of the line in all of these groups.

摘要

“标志性任务”旨在区分决定空间忽视中线二等分误差的两个主要因素:一个本质上是感知性的,另一个本质上是运动性的。在关键测试试验中,要求受试者指出被判断为更靠近横切线的横切中线的任意一端。八名忽视患者中有七名始终指向这些线的左端。因此,他们的错误判断方向与任何假定的“定向运动减退”相反。然而,有一名患者在这些测试试验中主要指向右侧。正常对照组和单侧中风患者也接受了标志性任务测试。在所有这些组中,提示线的一端会导致对该半条线的相对感知高估。

相似文献

1
An investigation of hemispatial neglect using the Landmark Task.一项使用地标任务对半侧空间忽视的调查。
Brain Cogn. 1995 Feb;27(1):59-78. doi: 10.1006/brcg.1995.1004.
2
Are there sex differences in hemispatial visual neglect after unilateral stroke?单侧中风后半侧空间视觉忽视是否存在性别差异?
Neuropsychiatry Neuropsychol Behav Neurol. 1997 Apr;10(2):125-34.
3
Visual and tactile rod bisection in unilateral neglect.单侧忽视中的视觉和触觉棒状二等分
Cortex. 1993 Dec;29(4):583-8. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80282-1.
4
Effect of attentional bias to right space on wheelchair mobility.对右侧空间的注意偏向对轮椅移动性的影响。
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1994 Feb;16(1):129-37. doi: 10.1080/01688639408402623.
5
A study of plane bisection in four cases of visual neglect.对4例视觉忽视患者进行的平面二等分研究。
Cortex. 1991 Jun;27(2):277-84. doi: 10.1016/s0010-9452(13)80132-3.
6
Is neglect (only) lateral? A quadrant analysis of line cancellation.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1989 Dec;11(6):793-8. doi: 10.1080/01688638908400936.
7
Effectiveness of neglect rehabilitation in a randomized group study.
J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 1995 May;17(3):383-9. doi: 10.1080/01688639508405131.
8
The Character-line Bisection Task: a new test for hemispatial neglect.字符线二等分任务:一种用于半侧空间忽视的新测试。
Neuropsychologia. 2004;42(12):1715-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.02.015.
9
Motor performance in aphasia and ideomotor apraxia.失语症和观念运动性失用症中的运动表现。
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Oct;79(2):719-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.2.719.
10
One hand is better than two: motor extinction of left hand advantage in unilateral neglect.单手优于双手:单侧忽视中左手优势的运动消退
Neuropsychologia. 1994 Jan;32(1):1-11. doi: 10.1016/0028-3932(94)90064-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatiotemporal processing of real faces is modified by visual sensing.真实面孔的时空处理会因视觉感知而改变。
Neuroimage. 2025 May 15;312:121219. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2025.121219. Epub 2025 Apr 17.
2
A meta-analysis of functional neuroimaging tasks associated with pseudoneglect.一项关于与假性忽视相关的功能性神经成像任务的荟萃分析。
Exp Brain Res. 2025 Apr 18;243(5):122. doi: 10.1007/s00221-025-07077-w.
3
Impact of macular scotoma and tubular vision on oculomotor behavior and performance in visuospatial comparison tasks.
黄斑暗点和管状视野对视动行为和视空间比较任务表现的影响。
J Vis. 2024 Sep 3;24(9):2. doi: 10.1167/jov.24.9.2.
4
Time Interaction With Two Spatial Dimensions: From Left/Right to Near/Far.具有两个空间维度的时间交互:从左/右到近/远。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2022 Jan 18;15:796799. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.796799. eCollection 2021.
5
Visual but Not Auditory-Verbal Feedback Induces Aftereffects Following Adaptation to Virtual Prisms.适应虚拟棱镜后,视觉而非听觉言语反馈会引发后效。
Front Neurosci. 2021 Oct 25;15:658353. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2021.658353. eCollection 2021.
6
The Ties that Bind: Agnosia, Neglect and Selective Attention to Visual Scale.束缚的纽带:失认症、忽视症与视觉比例的选择性注意
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2021 Sep 29;21(10):54. doi: 10.1007/s11910-021-01139-6.
7
Parietal Cortex Connectivity as a Marker of Shift in Spatial Attention Following Continuous Theta Burst Stimulation.顶叶皮层连接性作为连续theta爆发刺激后空间注意力转移的标志物。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2021 Sep 8;15:718662. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.718662. eCollection 2021.
8
A Meta-Analysis of Line Bisection and Landmark Task Performance in Older Adults.老年人的线二分和地标任务表现的荟萃分析。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2022 Jun;32(2):438-457. doi: 10.1007/s11065-021-09505-4. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
9
The reliability of pseudoneglect is task dependent.假性忽视的可靠性取决于任务。
Neuropsychologia. 2020 Nov;148:107618. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107618. Epub 2020 Sep 3.
10
Unstable world: Recent experience affects spatial perception.不稳定的世界:近期经历会影响空间感知。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Apr;27(2):286-292. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01703-9.