Motomura N
Department of Neurology, RWTH Aachen.
Percept Mot Skills. 1994 Oct;79(2):719-22. doi: 10.2466/pms.1994.79.2.719.
Motor performance in 11 patients with ideomotor apraxia, 11 with aphasia without such apraxia, and 11 normal controls was compared. These three groups were matched on age, sex, education, severity of aphasia, intelligence, and size of lesion. Measures of aiming, tapping, line-following, and steadiness developed by Schoppe in 1974 were used. Both apraxic and aphasic groups showed difficulties with motor performance, and the data of the apraxic group were poorer than those of the aphasic group. These results were consistent with Liepmann's theory.
对11例观念运动性失用症患者、11例无此类失用症的失语症患者以及11名正常对照者的运动表现进行了比较。这三组在年龄、性别、教育程度、失语症严重程度、智力和病变大小方面进行了匹配。采用了1974年由朔佩开发的瞄准、敲击、沿直线移动和稳定性测量方法。失用症组和失语症组在运动表现上均存在困难，且失用症组的数据比失语症组更差。这些结果与利希曼的理论一致。
