Clinical practice guidelines as tools of public policy: conflicts of purpose, issues of autonomy, and justice.
作者信息
Redman B K
机构信息
Johns Hopkins University School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD.
出版信息
J Clin Ethics. 1994 Winter;5(4):303-9.
PMID:7749175
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Clinical practice guidelines as tools of public policy: conflicts of purpose, issues of autonomy, and justice.作为公共政策工具的临床实践指南：目的冲突、自主性问题与正义问题
J Clin Ethics. 1994 Winter;5(4):303-9.
2
Justice and outcomes research: the ethical limits.公正与结果研究：伦理界限
J Clin Ethics. 1993 Fall;4(3):258-61.
3
4
Comments on the AMA report "Ethical issues in managed care".关于美国医学协会报告《管理式医疗中的伦理问题》的评论
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):306-11.
5
Redrawing the ethics map.重新绘制道德版图。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1999 Mar-Apr;29(2):28-9.
6
7
Rights, duties, and limits of autonomy.自主权的权利、义务和限制。
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1995 Winter;4(1):7-11.
8
Interests, obligations, and justice: some notes toward an ethic of managed care.利益、义务与公正：关于管理式医疗伦理的几点笔记
J Clin Ethics. 1995 Winter;6(4):312-7.
9
Rejecting organs: the organ allocation process and the Americans with Disabilities Act.拒绝器官：器官分配过程与《美国残疾人法案》
Am J Law Med. 1998;24(4):481-97.
10
Respect for autonomy.尊重自主性。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1994 May-Jun;24(3):34-5.
引用本文的文献
1
Ethical issues of cost effectiveness analysis and guideline setting in mental health care.精神卫生保健中成本效益分析和指南制定的伦理问题。
J Med Ethics. 2004 Apr;30(2):146-50. doi: 10.1136/jme.2003.007047.
2
Guidelines for appropriate care: the importance of empirical normative analysis.适当护理指南：实证规范分析的重要性。
Health Care Anal. 2001;9(1):77-99. doi: 10.1023/a:1011307112091.
Zotero 插件