Hernandez R, Bader S, Boston D, Trope M
Department of Endodontology, Temple Dental School, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
Int Endod J. 1994 Nov;27(6):281-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.1994.tb00269.x.
MOD cavities in 60 endodontically treated teeth were restored using six different methods. Copper rings were filled with commercial hard-setting cement and the teeth were placed up to the level of the cemento-enamel junction. The teeth were grouped according to restorative method, mounted in an Instron TT machine, and the buccal walls subjected to a slowly increasing compressive force until fracture occurred. The force of fracture of the walls of each tooth was recorded and the results in the various groups compared. All teeth fractured in a similar manner irrespective of the restorative method used. All groups restored with the newer bonding system had higher resistance to fracture than those restored with an acid etch chemically cured composite resin technique. The groups restored with Den-Mat Tenure Core Paste or a Variglass VLC base and Prisma APH were significantly stronger than the acid etch Concise restored teeth (P < 0.05). No statistically significant differences were found between the other groups (P > 0.05).
使用六种不同方法对60颗经根管治疗的牙齿的MOD洞进行修复。用市售硬固性粘固剂填充铜环,并将牙齿放置至牙骨质-釉质界水平。根据修复方法对牙齿进行分组,安装在英斯特朗TT机器中,颊壁承受逐渐增加的压缩力直至发生骨折。记录每颗牙齿壁的骨折力,并比较各组结果。无论使用何种修复方法,所有牙齿均以相似方式骨折。所有采用新型粘结系统修复的组比采用酸蚀化学固化复合树脂技术修复的组具有更高的抗骨折能力。用登马特Tenure Core糊剂或VariGlass VLC基底和Prisma APH修复的组比酸蚀Concise修复的牙齿明显更强(P < 0.05)。其他组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异(P > 0.05)。