Giamarellou H
Department of Internal Medicine, Athens University School of Medicine, Laiko, General Hospital, Greece.
Med Clin North Am. 1995 May;79(3):559-80. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30057-8.
In the years to come, it is likely that with the advent of cytokines and even more with possibility to insert drug-resistant genes into hematopoietic stem cells, the risk of infection will be decreased because the severity and duration of neutropenia will be minimized. It is true that the ideal empiric antimicrobial regimen--a single antibiotic with a low incidence of superinfection and a low toxicity, without need for subsequent additions and readjustments--is still a wish. In the meantime and while living in the neutropenic area, physicians, for the benefit of patients, have to follow guidelines and create algorithms (see Fig. 1). Recommendations, however, should be always adjustable to the individual characteristics of the patient and the institution and to progress in antimicrobial chemotherapy. It is inevitable that research and clinical practice should go "hand in hand" in these "difficult-to-manage" and "difficult-to-treat" patients. After all, it should never be forgotten that the ultimate goal of empiric antimicrobial regimens in febrile neutropenia is to ensure patients' survival.
在未来几年,随着细胞因子的出现,甚至更有可能将耐药基因插入造血干细胞,感染风险可能会降低,因为中性粒细胞减少的严重程度和持续时间将降至最低。诚然,理想的经验性抗菌方案——一种单一抗生素,超级感染发生率低且毒性低,无需后续添加和调整——仍然只是一个愿望。与此同时,在中性粒细胞减少症患者居住期间,为了患者的利益,医生必须遵循指南并制定算法(见图1)。然而,建议应始终根据患者和机构的个体特征以及抗菌化疗的进展进行调整。在这些“难以管理”和“难以治疗”的患者中,研究和临床实践必然要“携手并进”。毕竟,绝不能忘记,发热性中性粒细胞减少症经验性抗菌方案的最终目标是确保患者存活。