Cunha B A
Infectious Disease Division, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA.
Med Clin North Am. 1995 May;79(3):581-97. doi: 10.1016/s0025-7125(16)30058-x.
Optimal antibiotic regimens and duration of treatment are not universally agreed on for community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonias. Experience suggests that community-acquired pneumonias may be treated for less than 2 weeks with a combination of intravenous and oral antibiotics of appropriate spectrum that penetrate the lung, have a good safety profile, do not foster the development of resistance, and are cost-effective. After initial intravenous therapy, oral switch therapy may be begun as soon as the patient defervesces clinically, which is usually 3 days after admission. Switching to oral therapy does not invariably lead to earlier hospital discharge. There is no "standard of care" for pneumonias, but guidelines for empiric use have existed for decades. The least expensive beta-lactamase stable antibiotic should be used as monotherapy for the empiric treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Because community-acquired atypical pneumonias are clinically distinct from bacterial pneumonias owing to their extrapulmonary features, clinicians should be able to differentiate atypical pneumonias from bacterial pneumonias, which permits prompt and appropriate treatment. Nosocomial pneumonias remain a difficult diagnostic challenge. Therapeutically the most important principle in treating nosocomial pneumonia is to provide for double-drug coverage against P. aeruginosa. Differentiation of respiratory tract colonization from respiratory tract invasion remains the central key issue in patients with pulmonary infiltrates acquired during hospitalization. Most patients complete their course of intravenous therapy for nosocomial pneumonia leaving little or no time for completion of their therapy by oral antibiotics. Hospital-acquired atypical pneumonias are largely limited to legionnaires' disease, which is a more difficult diagnosis than in the community-acquired setting. Clinicians taking care of patients with pneumonia should employ a simplified therapeutic approach using a single drug for community-acquired infections. The use of additional antibiotics to increase gram-negative coverage is medically unjustified and not cost-effective and is to be discouraged. The most cost-effective strategy for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonias is to switch the patient from an intravenous to an oral antibiotic as soon as the patient clinically defervesces and is able to take oral medications. Antimediator therapies have no role in the treatment of community-acquired or nosocomial pneumonias.
对于社区获得性肺炎或医院获得性肺炎,最佳抗生素治疗方案和疗程尚未达成普遍共识。经验表明,社区获得性肺炎可采用能穿透肺部、安全性良好、不易产生耐药性且具有成本效益的合适抗菌谱的静脉和口服抗生素联合治疗,疗程可少于2周。初始静脉治疗后,一旦患者临床退热(通常在入院后3天),即可开始口服序贯治疗。转为口服治疗并不一定能使患者更早出院。肺炎不存在“标准治疗方案”,但经验性用药指南已存在数十年。应使用最便宜的β-内酰胺酶稳定抗生素作为社区获得性肺炎经验性治疗的单一药物。由于社区获得性非典型肺炎因其肺外特征在临床上与细菌性肺炎不同,临床医生应能够区分非典型肺炎和细菌性肺炎,以便及时进行适当治疗。医院获得性肺炎仍然是一个困难的诊断挑战。在治疗医院获得性肺炎时,最重要的治疗原则是提供针对铜绿假单胞菌的双联药物覆盖。区分呼吸道定植与呼吸道侵袭仍然是住院期间出现肺部浸润患者的核心关键问题。大多数医院获得性肺炎患者完成静脉治疗疗程后,几乎没有或没有时间通过口服抗生素完成治疗。医院获得性非典型肺炎主要局限于军团菌病,其诊断比社区获得性情况下更困难。照顾肺炎患者的临床医生应采用简化的治疗方法,对于社区获得性感染使用单一药物。使用额外抗生素增加革兰阴性菌覆盖在医学上不合理且不具有成本效益,应予以劝阻。治疗社区获得性肺炎最具成本效益的策略是,一旦患者临床退热且能够口服药物,就将其从静脉抗生素转换为口服抗生素。抗介质疗法在社区获得性或医院获得性肺炎的治疗中没有作用。