Vinik A I, Suwanwalaikorn S, Stansberry K B, Holland M T, McNitt P M, Colen L E
Department of Internal Medicine, Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk 23510, USA.
Muscle Nerve. 1995 Jun;18(6):574-84. doi: 10.1002/mus.880180603.
To determine the diagnostic value of various cutaneous sensory modalities in diabetic neuropathy, we studied cutaneous perception at the dominant hallux of 113 subjects (32 normal healthy controls and 81 diabetic subjects). The cutaneous sensory perception tests included warm and cold thermal perception, vibration, touch-pressure sensation, and current perception testing (CPT). The sensitivity of each modality when specificity is held greater than 90% was as follows: warm = 78%, cold = 77%, vibration = 88%, tactile-pressure = 77%, 5-Hz CPT = 52%, 250-Hz CPT = 48%, and 2000-Hz CPT = 56%. Combination thermal and vibratory gave optimum sensitivity (92-95%) and specificity (77-86%). We conclude that vibratory and thermal testing should be the primary screening tests for diabetic peripheral neuropathy. Other modalities may be of use only in specific situations.
为了确定各种皮肤感觉模式在糖尿病神经病变中的诊断价值,我们研究了113名受试者(32名正常健康对照者和81名糖尿病患者)优势拇趾处的皮肤感觉。皮肤感觉测试包括温觉和冷觉、振动觉、轻触觉压力觉以及电流感觉测试(CPT)。当特异性保持大于90%时,每种感觉模式的敏感性如下:温觉=78%,冷觉=77%,振动觉=88%,轻触觉压力觉=77%,5赫兹CPT=52%,250赫兹CPT=48%,2000赫兹CPT=56%。温觉和振动觉联合测试具有最佳的敏感性(92 - 95%)和特异性(77 - 86%)。我们得出结论,振动觉和温觉测试应作为糖尿病周围神经病变的主要筛查测试。其他感觉模式可能仅在特定情况下有用。