Department of Ophthalmology, University of Rostock, Rostock, Germany.
PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e52157. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052157. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
The alterations of subbasal nerve plexus (SBP) innervation and corneal sensation were estimated non-invasively and compared with the values in healthy volunteers. Additionally, this study addressed the relation of SBP changes to the retinal status, glycemic control and diabetes duration.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Eighteen eyes of diabetic patients with peripheral diabetic neuropathy aged 68.8±8.8 years and twenty eyes of healthy volunteers aged 66.3±13.3 yrs. were investigated with in vivo confocal laser-scanning microscopy (CLSM). An adapted algorithm for image analysis was used to quantify the morphological and topological properties of SBP. These properties were correlated to incidence of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and corneal sensation (Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer). The developed algorithm allows a fully automated analysis of pre-segmented SBP structures. Altogether, 10 parameters were analysed, and all of them revealed significant differences between diabetic patients and healthy volunteers. The nerve fibre density, total fibre length and nerve branches were found to be significantly lower in patients with diabetes than those of control subjects (nerve fibre density 0.006±0.002 vs. 0.020±0.007 mm/mm(2); total fibre length 6223±2419 vs. 19961±6553 µm; nerve branches 25.3±28.6 vs. 141.9±85.7 in healthy volunteers). Also the corneal sensation was significantly lower in diabetic group when compared to controls (43±11 vs. 59±18 mm). There was found no difference in SBP morphology or corneal sensation in the subgroups with (DR) or without (NDR) diabetic retinopathy.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: SBP parameters were significantly reduced in diabetic patients, compared to control group. Interestingly, the SBP impairment could be shown even in the diabetic patients without DR. Although automatic adapted image analysis simplifies the evaluation of in vivo CLSM data, image acquisition and quantitative analysis should be optimised for the everyday clinical practice.
本研究采用非侵入性方法评估了亚基底神经丛(SBP)神经支配和角膜感觉的变化,并与健康志愿者的结果进行了比较。此外,本研究还探讨了 SBP 变化与视网膜状态、血糖控制和糖尿病病程的关系。
方法/主要发现:本研究共纳入 18 只患有周围神经病变的糖尿病患者(年龄 68.8±8.8 岁)和 20 只健康志愿者(年龄 66.3±13.3 岁)的眼睛,采用共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)进行检测。采用改良的图像分析算法来量化 SBP 的形态和拓扑结构。将这些参数与糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)和角膜感觉(Cochet-Bonnet 触觉计)的发生情况进行相关性分析。开发的算法可以对分割的 SBP 结构进行全自动分析。总共分析了 10 个参数,糖尿病患者与健康志愿者之间的所有参数均存在显著差异。与对照组相比,糖尿病患者的神经纤维密度、总纤维长度和神经分支明显降低(神经纤维密度 0.006±0.002 vs. 0.020±0.007 mm/mm2;总纤维长度 6223±2419 vs. 19961±6553 µm;神经分支 25.3±28.6 vs. 141.9±85.7 在健康志愿者中)。与对照组相比,糖尿病组的角膜感觉也明显降低(43±11 vs. 59±18 mm)。有或无糖尿病视网膜病变(DR)的亚组之间,SBP 形态或角膜感觉均无差异。
结论/意义:与对照组相比,糖尿病患者的 SBP 参数明显降低。有趣的是,即使在没有 DR 的糖尿病患者中,也可以观察到 SBP 损伤。尽管自动适应的图像分析简化了对体内 CLSM 数据的评估,但图像采集和定量分析仍应针对日常临床实践进行优化。