Suppr超能文献

[荷兰家庭医生学院的“(即将发生的)流产标准”与妇科医生的处理方式相符吗?]

[Does the '(Imminent) miscarriage standard of the Dutch College of Family Physicians correspond to the management by gynecologists?].

作者信息

Fleuren M A, de Haan M, Grol R P

机构信息

Onderzoekscentrum Ie-2e lijn, Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1995 May 6;139(18):930-4.

PMID:7753225
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine if the '(Imminent) miscarriage' standard issued by the Dutch College of General Practitioners corresponds to the management by obstetricians.

DESIGN

Postal questionnaire.

SETTING

Research Centre Primary/Secondary Health Care, Free University Hospital Amsterdam.

METHOD

A postal questionnaire was sent in 1994 to all partnerships of obstetricians (n = 122) in the Netherlands about their management in case of an imminent miscarriage.

RESULTS

The response rate was 86% (n = 105). Nearly all partnerships (94%) had an agreement about their management in case of an imminent miscarriage, but the individual protocols varied. In case of a miscarriage or an imminent miscarriage 10% and 28% respectively of all partnerships said they would refer the woman to the GP or midwife. Furthermore, 21% of all partnerships said that the GP or midwife could not have an ultrasound scan made themselves, i.e. without referring to the obstetrician. Many respondent knowing the GP standard (64%) did not agree with the guidelines restricting ultrasound scans (39%) or advising expectative management (24%). They thought that an ultrasound scan was essential to diagnosis and that an expectative management would increase the risk of severe blood loss. On the other hand 15% agreed to all the guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The management of obstetricians with respect to (imminent) miscarriage is diverse and does not correspond to the guidelines of the '(Imminent) miscarriage' GP standard, notably with respect to the advised expectative management.

摘要

目的

确定荷兰全科医生学院发布的“(即将发生的)流产”标准是否与产科医生的处理方式相符。

设计

邮寄问卷调查。

地点

阿姆斯特丹自由大学医院初级/二级医疗保健研究中心。

方法

1994年向荷兰所有产科医生合作团队(n = 122)邮寄了一份关于即将发生流产时处理方式的问卷。

结果

回复率为86%(n = 105)。几乎所有合作团队(94%)对于即将发生流产时的处理方式都有协议,但各个团队的具体方案有所不同。在流产或即将发生流产的情况下,分别有10%和28%的合作团队表示会将女性转诊给全科医生或助产士。此外,21%的合作团队表示全科医生或助产士自己无法进行超声检查,即不转诊给产科医生就无法进行。许多了解全科医生标准的受访者(64%)不同意限制超声检查的指南(39%)或建议期待治疗的指南(24%)。他们认为超声检查对诊断至关重要,而期待治疗会增加严重失血的风险。另一方面,15%的人同意所有指南。

结论

产科医生对于(即将发生的)流产的处理方式各不相同,与“(即将发生的)流产”全科医生标准的指南不相符,尤其是在建议的期待治疗方面。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验