Suppr超能文献

[荷兰家庭医生协会“(先兆)流产”指南所反映的阿姆斯特丹家庭医生和产科医生对(先兆)流产进行转诊的原因]

[Cause for referral by family physicians and obstetricians in Amsterdam in (threatened) miscarriage as reflected in the guideline '(Threatened) abortion' of the Dutch Society for Family Physicians].

作者信息

Fleuren M A, Engelsbel S, Wijkel D, Schutte M F, de Haan M

机构信息

Onderzoekscentrum 1e-2e lijn, Academisch Ziekenhuis Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam.

出版信息

Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1996 Sep 28;140(39):1956-9.

PMID:8927183
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the reasons general practitioners (GPs) and midwives have for referring patients with symptoms of imminent miscarriage to hospital and the management in hospital.

DESIGN

Prospective and descriptive.

SETTING

Research Centre Primary/Secondary Health Care, University Hospital Free University, the "Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis' hospital, both in Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

METHOD

During the period August 1994-February 1995 anamnesis, diagnostics, diagnosis and further management were recorded for all patients who visited the "Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis' hospital with blood loss and/or pain in the first 16 weeks of gestation. Patients revealed their wishes concerning referral by filling in questionnaires. Their GPs/midwives were asked about the referral motives in a telephone interview.

RESULTS

In the hospital 105 patients were recorded; 34% came on their own initiative. In hospital none of the patients with the diagnosis "imminent miscarriage' was referred back to the GP/midwife. Only 59% of the GPs/midwives performed the physical examinations the (imminent) miscarriage guideline of the Dutch College of General Practitioners advises. In 56% of the 32 patients referred there was no reason for referral according to the (imminent) miscarriage guideline.

CONCLUSION

The (imminent) miscarriage guideline issued by the Dutch College of General Practitioners was not always followed because patients went to the hospital on their own account, GPs/midwives did not agree with the guideline, patients wanted another policy and obstetricians kept patients in their own care.

摘要

目的

确定全科医生(GP)和助产士将有即将流产症状的患者转诊至医院的原因以及在医院的处理方式。

设计

前瞻性和描述性研究。

地点

荷兰阿姆斯特丹自由大学医学中心初级/二级医疗保健研究中心、“Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis”医院。

方法

在1994年8月至1995年2月期间,记录了所有在妊娠前16周因失血和/或疼痛前往“Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis”医院就诊患者的病史、诊断、确诊情况及后续处理。患者通过填写问卷表明其转诊意愿。通过电话访谈询问其全科医生/助产士的转诊动机。

结果

医院记录了105例患者;34%是自行前来。在医院里,诊断为“即将流产”的患者均未被转回给全科医生/助产士。荷兰全科医生学院的(即将流产)指南建议进行体格检查,但只有59%的全科医生/助产士进行了此项检查。在转诊的32例患者中,根据(即将流产)指南,56%的患者并无转诊理由。

结论

荷兰全科医生学院发布的(即将流产)指南并非总能得到遵循,原因包括患者自行前往医院、全科医生/助产士不同意该指南、患者希望采取其他策略以及产科医生自行收治患者。

相似文献

9
Care for the imminent miscarriage by midwives and GPs.
Fam Pract. 1994 Sep;11(3):275-81. doi: 10.1093/fampra/11.3.275.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验