• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

缓释尼卡地平与硝苯地平治疗心绞痛的疗效及安全性比较

[The efficacy and safety of slow-release nicardipine vs nifedipine in angina].

作者信息

Villanova C, Maddalena F, Rocco C G

机构信息

Unità di Cura Intensiva Coronarica, Ospedale Civile, Padova.

出版信息

Minerva Cardioangiol. 1994 Dec;42(12):583-9.

PMID:7753427
Abstract

This controlled, double-blind, completely randomized study assessed the efficacy and safety of nicardipine and nifedipine, both in slow-release formulations, in patients with unstable angina. Thirty patients (28 M, 2F) were included in the final analysis, mean age 56.5 +/- 9.1 years (SD), mean weight 73.5 +/- 9.2 kg, mean height 171.5 +/- 6.5 cm, all with unstable angina. Nicardipine was given at a daily dosage of 80-120 mg, and nifedipine 40-60 mg, for up to one month. At the end of treatment with nicardipine supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) dropped respectively 7.7% and 5.5% at 8 am and 8.6% and 7.1% at 8 pm. Nifedipine reduced SBP and DBP by respectively 6.5% and 13.1% at 8 am and 5.3% and 9.4% at 8 pm. There was no clinical or statistical difference between the treatments. Heart rate did not change appreciably during either treatment. On completion of nicardipine treatment, 87.5% of patients had suffered no angina attacks, compared with 66.7% for nifedipine. The remaining 12.5% of patients treated with nicardipine presented only one mild angina attack per day, while the other 33.3% of the nifedipine patients had one moderate angina attack per day. No untoward effects were reported with nicardipine; one patient receiving nifedipine presented cardiopalmus and another complained of headache. These results indicate that nicardipine is at least as safe and effective as nifedipine in the treatment of unstable angina.

摘要

这项对照、双盲、完全随机的研究评估了缓释制剂尼卡地平和硝苯地平在不稳定型心绞痛患者中的疗效和安全性。最终分析纳入了30例患者(28例男性,2例女性),平均年龄56.5±9.1岁(标准差),平均体重73.5±9.2千克,平均身高171.5±6.5厘米,均患有不稳定型心绞痛。尼卡地平的每日剂量为80 - 120毫克,硝苯地平为40 - 60毫克,用药长达1个月。在尼卡地平治疗结束时,上午8点仰卧位收缩压和舒张压(SBP和DBP)分别下降了7.7%和5.5%,晚上8点分别下降了8.6%和7.1%。硝苯地平上午8点时SBP和DBP分别降低了6.5%和13.1%,晚上8点时分别降低了5.3%和9.4%。两种治疗方法在临床和统计学上均无差异。在任何一种治疗期间心率均无明显变化。尼卡地平治疗结束时,87.5%的患者未发生心绞痛发作,而硝苯地平组为66.7%。接受尼卡地平治疗的其余12.5%的患者每天仅出现1次轻度心绞痛发作,而接受硝苯地平治疗的患者中有33.3%每天出现1次中度心绞痛发作。未报告尼卡地平有不良影响;1例接受硝苯地平治疗的患者出现心悸,另1例抱怨头痛。这些结果表明,在治疗不稳定型心绞痛方面,尼卡地平至少与硝苯地平一样安全有效。

相似文献

1
[The efficacy and safety of slow-release nicardipine vs nifedipine in angina].缓释尼卡地平与硝苯地平治疗心绞痛的疗效及安全性比较
Minerva Cardioangiol. 1994 Dec;42(12):583-9.
2
Lisinopril versus slow release nifedipine in patients with essential hypertension: a multicentre study.赖诺普利与缓释硝苯地平治疗原发性高血压患者的多中心研究
J Hum Hypertens. 1994 Oct;8(10):777-80.
3
Antihypertensive efficacy of a slow release nifedipine tablet formulation given once daily in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. A placebo-controlled, double-blind parallel-group trial.轻度至中度高血压患者每日服用一次硝苯地平缓释片制剂的降压疗效。一项安慰剂对照、双盲平行组试验。
Arzneimittelforschung. 1994 Feb;44(2):133-6.
4
Prazosin GITS vs sustained release nifedipine in patients with hypertension and abnormal lipid profile: a randomized, controlled, multicenter study. Madras Hypertension Study Group.高血压合并血脂异常患者中哌唑嗪控释片与硝苯地平缓释片的比较:一项随机、对照、多中心研究。马德拉斯高血压研究组
J Assoc Physicians India. 1998;Suppl 1:30-40.
5
[Blood pressure monitoring in aged hypertensive patients treated with sustained-release nicardipine or nifedipine].
Schweiz Med Wochenschr. 1990 Dec 8;120(49):1887-9.
6
Acute effects of nicardipine and esmolol on the cardiac cycle, intracardiac hemodynamic and endothelial shear stress in patients with unstable angina pectoris and moderate coronary stenosis: results from single center, randomized study.尼卡地平与艾司洛尔对不稳定型心绞痛伴中度冠状动脉狭窄患者心动周期、心内血液动力学及内皮剪切力的急性影响:单中心随机研究结果。
Cardiovasc Ther. 2012 Jun;30(3):162-71. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-5922.2011.00298.x. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
7
Nifedipine versus propranolol treatment for unstable angina in the elderly.硝苯地平与普萘洛尔治疗老年不稳定型心绞痛的对比
Can J Cardiol. 1988 Nov-Dec;4(8):402-6.
8
Efficacy and tolerability of extended-release felodipine and extended-release nifedipine in patients with mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.缓释非洛地平和缓释硝苯地平治疗轻至中度原发性高血压患者的疗效及耐受性
Clin Ther. 1994 Jul-Aug;16(4):634-46.
9
A double-blind, controlled, multicenter, randomized study comparing the antihypertensive effectiveness and tolerance of a daily dose of two nifedipine formulations: nifedipine microgranules versus nifedipine osmotic pump.一项双盲、对照、多中心、随机研究,比较每日剂量的两种硝苯地平制剂(硝苯地平微粒与硝苯地平渗透泵)的降压效果和耐受性。
Am J Ther. 2007 Mar-Apr;14(2):140-6. doi: 10.1097/01.pap.0000249913.05896.3f.
10
[Antihypertensive effect and tolerability of slow-release nicardipine].[缓释尼卡地平的降压效果及耐受性]
Cardiologia. 1989 Feb;34(2):161-5.