Redefining the nursing shortage: a rural perspective.

A number of researchers have suggested that nursing shortages are closely related to geographic maldistribution, specialty areas, and even individual shifts. As these findings have documented, the nursing shortage, as defined by the federal government, exists predominantly in rural areas of the country that are not adjacent to metropolitan areas. As a result, many of the economic, demographic, and health-related disparities that exist between rural and urban populations are mirrored in shortage and nonshortage counties. Higher unemployment rates and lower per capita incomes suggest an underlying relationship between economic vitality and the recruitment and retention of health care personnel. This suggests that a fundamental obstacle to staffing adequate numbers of qualified nurses in rural areas may not be a shortage of nurses, but economic barriers (domestic and health care related) deeply rooted in the rural settings themselves. In those states burdened with significant shortage areas, emphasis must be placed on easing the maldistribution of available nurses away from rural, often medically underserved settings. However, while the notion of producing appropriate "types" of nurses is well founded, the temptation to "solve" the problem simply by producing more providers should be resisted, since it will not markedly benefit those areas that are currently in greatest need. The time frame necessary for such "trickle down" approaches to affect rural areas could, when combined with other factors, render many health care delivery systems virtually unsalvageable. To address the persistent distribution problem, we could change how health professionals are educated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)