• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

准备工作在重叠任务执行中的作用。

The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance.

作者信息

De Jong R

机构信息

University of Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 Feb;48(1):2-25. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401372.

DOI:10.1080/14640749508401372
PMID:7754082
Abstract

We examined how performance of two overlapping discrete tasks is organized and controlled. Experiment 1 showed that when stimuli were presented in an unexpected order, expectations rather than actual presentation order determined the order in which the two stimuli were processed. In Experiment 2, when task order was unpredictable, performance was facilitated when task order was repeated on consecutive trials. In Experiment 3, performance of the second but not the first task benefited greatly when task order was held constant as compared to regularly alternated between trials; such effects were especially pronounced at short intertrial intervals. These results suggest that sequential performance of overlapping tasks is scheduled in advance and is regulated by initially allocating the central processing channel to one task and subsequently switching this channel to the other task.

摘要

我们研究了两个重叠的离散任务的执行是如何组织和控制的。实验1表明,当刺激以意外顺序呈现时,期望而非实际呈现顺序决定了处理这两个刺激的顺序。在实验2中,当任务顺序不可预测时,连续试验中重复任务顺序会促进表现。在实验3中,与试验间定期交替相比,当任务顺序保持恒定时,第二个任务而非第一个任务的表现受益极大;这种效应在短试验间隔时尤其明显。这些结果表明,重叠任务的顺序执行是预先安排的,并且通过最初将中央处理通道分配给一个任务,随后将该通道切换到另一个任务来进行调节。

相似文献

1
The role of preparation in overlapping-task performance.准备工作在重叠任务执行中的作用。
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1995 Feb;48(1):2-25. doi: 10.1080/14640749508401372.
2
Task-set inertia and memory-consolidation bottleneck in dual tasks.双重任务中的任务集惯性和记忆巩固瓶颈
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):448-58. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0020-8. Epub 2005 Oct 8.
3
Multiple bottlenecks in overlapping task performance.
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1993 Oct;19(5):965-80. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.19.5.965.
4
Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies.心理不应期范式中的逆向串扰效应:第二项任务反应类型对第一项任务反应潜伏期的影响。
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):484-93. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9. Epub 2005 Oct 20.
5
Bypassing the central bottleneck after single-task practice in the psychological refractory period paradigm: evidence for task automatization and greedy resource recruitment.在心理不应期范式下单任务练习后绕过中央瓶颈:任务自动化和贪婪资源招募的证据。
Mem Cognit. 2008 Oct;36(7):1262-82. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.7.1262.
6
Parallel response selection disrupts sequence learning under dual-task conditions.并行反应选择会干扰双任务条件下的序列学习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2009 May;138(2):270-90. doi: 10.1037/a0015378.
7
Graded capacity-sharing in dual-task interference?双任务干扰中的分级容量共享?
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1994 Apr;20(2):330-42. doi: 10.1037//0096-1523.20.2.330.
8
Task switching and action sequencing.
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):526-40. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0014-6. Epub 2005 Nov 19.
9
What causes residual dual-task interference after practice?练习后残留的双重任务干扰是由什么引起的?
Psychol Res. 2006 Nov;70(6):494-503. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0012-8. Epub 2005 Sep 24.
10
The dual-task SRT procedure: fine-tuning the timing.
Psychon Bull Rev. 2001 Jun;8(2):336-42. doi: 10.3758/bf03196170.

引用本文的文献

1
Ultrafast fMRI reveals serial queuing of information processing during multitasking in the human brain.超快功能磁共振成像揭示了人类大脑在多任务处理过程中信息处理的序列排队现象。
Nat Commun. 2025 Mar 29;16(1):3057. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58228-0.
2
What Task Feature Determines the Dominant Task in Dual-Task Conditions?在双任务条件下,是什么任务特征决定了主导任务?
eNeuro. 2025 Mar 27;12(3). doi: 10.1523/ENEURO.0542-24.2025. Print 2025 Mar.
3
Multi-tasking costs in triple-task performance despite dual-task preparation.尽管进行了双任务准备,但三任务执行中的多任务成本依然存在。
Mem Cognit. 2025 Jan 28. doi: 10.3758/s13421-024-01674-w.
4
Comparing laboratory and online settings: equivalence in training and transfer effects for training task-order coordination processes.比较实验室环境与在线环境:训练任务顺序协调过程中训练及迁移效果的等效性
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 1;15:1440057. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1440057. eCollection 2024.
5
Task-order control in dual-tasks: Only marginal interactions between conflict at lower levels and higher processes of task organization.任务转换控制中的双重任务:仅在较低层次的冲突与较高层次的任务组织过程之间存在边缘交互。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Jul;86(5):1-23. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02876-9. Epub 2024 May 8.
6
Controlling response order without relying on stimulus order - evidence for flexible representations of task order.无需依赖刺激顺序控制反应顺序——任务顺序的灵活表示的证据。
Psychol Res. 2024 Jul;88(5):1712-1726. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01953-w. Epub 2024 Apr 13.
7
A mechanism underlying improved dual-task performance after practice: Reviewing evidence for the memory hypothesis.练习后改善双重任务表现的潜在机制:回顾记忆假说的证据。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2005-2021. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02498-0. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
8
Can frequent long stimulus onset ansynchronies (SOAs) foster the representation of two separated task-sets in dual-tasking?频繁的长刺激起始异步(SOA)能否促进双重任务中两个分离任务集的表示?
Psychol Res. 2024 Jun;88(4):1231-1252. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-01935-y. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
9
Practice effects on dual-task order coordination and its sequential adjustment.双任务顺序协调及其顺序调整中的练习效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Oct;31(5):2189-2204. doi: 10.3758/s13423-024-02476-6. Epub 2024 Feb 26.
10
Cognitive effects of prolonged continuous human-machine interaction: The case for mental state-based adaptive interfaces.长时间持续人机交互的认知影响:基于心理状态的自适应界面案例
Front Neuroergon. 2022 Aug 26;3:935092. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2022.935092. eCollection 2022.