Tejada García J, Martínez Valderrábano V, Fernández López F, Hernández Echebarría L, Balboa Arregui O, Martínez Blanco L, González Vega C
Sección de Neurología, Complejo Hospitalario del INSALUD, León.
Rev Clin Esp. 1995 Mar;195(3):141-6.
In order to evaluate the pathogenic role of carotid atheromatosis and risk factors for the lacunar type of cerebral ischaemia a comparative analysis was made between a group of patients with this type of stroke and other with non-lacunar infarctions. Unlike previous works, patients with clinical-radiological criteria for ischaemia in the carotid territory were included in both groups.
Ninety-eight patients with a first episode of stroke were selected prospectively. Strokes were classified as lacunar (52 patients) and non-lacunar (46 patients). The following risk factors were evaluated: age, sex, increased blood pressure, left ventricle enlargement, smoking, alcohol intake, lipid profile, history of previous transient stroke, arterial retinopathy, diabetes, ischaemic heart disease and presence of peripheral arteriopathy. The narrowing degree of the carotid artery was determined by means of Doppler ultrasonography.
Significant differences were found for the presence of two variables: hypertensive retinopathy was more prevalent in the lacunar group (p = 0.003) and history of transient ischaemic stroke was recorded more frequently in association with non-lacunar infarction (p = 0.01). A 50%-70% degree of narrowing in the upper carotid artery was observed more frequently in association with non-lacunar infarctions (p < 0.001) in the ipsilateral artery to the symptomatic hemisphere. In the heterolateral artery the narrowing degree was similar for both groups (p = 0.87).
Lacunar and non-lacunar infarctions share the same risk factors; nevertheless, the distribution of atheromatous lesions was different. The presence of hypertensive retinopathy is an excellent marker for perforant arterial disease. The carotid stenosis is an unusual pathogenic mechanism for the development of ischaemic lacunar syndrome with an appropriate injury visualized by CT.
为了评估颈动脉粥样硬化的致病作用以及腔隙性脑缺血的危险因素,对一组患有此类中风的患者与另一组患有非腔隙性梗死的患者进行了对比分析。与以往研究不同的是,两组均纳入了符合颈动脉区域缺血临床放射学标准的患者。
前瞻性选取98例首次发生中风的患者。中风被分为腔隙性(52例患者)和非腔隙性(46例患者)。评估了以下危险因素:年龄、性别、血压升高、左心室扩大、吸烟、饮酒、血脂谱、既往短暂性中风史、动脉视网膜病变、糖尿病、缺血性心脏病以及外周动脉病变的存在情况。通过多普勒超声检查确定颈动脉狭窄程度。
发现两个变量存在显著差异:高血压视网膜病变在腔隙性组中更为普遍(p = 0.003),短暂性缺血性中风史在非腔隙性梗死患者中记录更为频繁(p = 0.01)。在有症状半球同侧动脉中,非腔隙性梗死患者更常观察到颈总动脉上部50% - 70%的狭窄程度(p < 0.001)。在对侧动脉中,两组的狭窄程度相似(p = 0.87)。
腔隙性和非腔隙性梗死具有相同的危险因素;然而,动脉粥样硬化病变的分布有所不同。高血压视网膜病变的存在是穿通动脉疾病的一个良好标志。颈动脉狭窄是缺血性腔隙综合征发生的一种不常见致病机制,CT可显示适当的损伤。