Suppr超能文献

[全身麻醉期间类过敏性休克的治疗策略。病因及诊断评估]

[Therapeutic strategy in anaphylactoid shock during general anesthesia. Etiologic agents and diagnostic evaluation].

作者信息

Oulieu S, Olivier J, Bourget P, Marotel C

机构信息

Service de Pharmacie, Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Dominique Larrey, Versailles, France.

出版信息

Therapie. 1995 Jan-Feb;50(1):59-66.

PMID:7754480
Abstract

In 1983, the risk of developing severe shock during anaesthesia was estimated to be 1 case in 4600 procedures with an associated mortality rate of 6 per cent. The incidence of severe accidents has further increased since this time. This review focuses on the aspects of anaphylactoid shock (AS) in the context of iatrogenic responsibility involving drugs or substances used during anaesthesia or placed in contact with viscera. The elements predictive of anaphylactoid shock are described together with the arguments involved in a biochemical conception and a physiological conception. The authors emphasize the importance of the operative report and anaesthetic sheet to retrospectively establish the chronology of the events and to facilitate the allergologic work-up. The treatment of AS is an emergency. The therapeutic protocol is relatively well defined and, in addition to IV fluids, adrenalin is the drug of choice during the acute phase of AS. The therapeutic approach to certain particular cases is discussed and future therapeutic concepts are proposed. The aetiological agents of AS are discussed together with their respective frequencies in the specific case of the anaphylaxis reaction. Muscle relaxants are the leading cause of anaphylaxis (70 per cent of cases), especially suxamethonium, vecuronium and atracurium (43 per cent, 33 per cent and 6.8 per cent of cases, respectively). Latex present in various materials, especially surgical gloves, has become the most disturbing substance, responsible for 0.5 per cent of AS in 1989 vs 12.5 per cent of cases in 1991. Hypnotic drugs, although very widely used, are much more rarely incriminated.

摘要

1983年,麻醉期间发生严重休克的风险估计为每4600例手术中有1例,相关死亡率为6%。自那时以来,严重事故的发生率进一步上升。本综述聚焦于类过敏性休克(AS)在医源性责任方面的情况,涉及麻醉期间使用的药物或物质,或与内脏接触的物质。描述了类过敏性休克的预测因素,以及生化概念和生理概念中涉及的论据。作者强调手术报告和麻醉记录单对于追溯事件发生时间顺序以及促进过敏诊断工作的重要性。AS的治疗是紧急情况。治疗方案相对明确,除静脉输液外,肾上腺素是AS急性期的首选药物。讨论了某些特殊病例的治疗方法,并提出了未来的治疗概念。还讨论了AS的病因及其在过敏反应特定病例中的各自发生率。肌肉松弛剂是过敏反应的主要原因(70%的病例),尤其是琥珀胆碱、维库溴铵和阿曲库铵(分别占病例的43%、33%和6.8%)。各种材料中存在的乳胶,尤其是手术手套中的乳胶,已成为最令人不安的物质,在1989年占AS病例的0.5%,而在1991年占12.5%。催眠药物虽然使用非常广泛,但很少被认定为病因。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验