Valji K, Bookstein J J, Roberts A C, Oglevie S B, Pittman C, O'Neill M P
Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, Medical Center 92103, USA.
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995 Jun;164(6):1495-500; discussion 1501-3. doi: 10.2214/ajr.164.6.7754901.
Pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is an evolving method for the treatment of vascular occlusions in which a highly concentrated fibrinolytic agent is injected as a high-pressure spray directly into thrombus. The purpose of this retrospective study was to analyze our long-term experience with this technique for the treatment of clotted hemodialysis grafts and to compare the efficacy and safety of the original and current methods.
Over 6 years, 284 cases of dialysis graft thrombosis were considered suitable for treatment with pulse-spray thrombolysis. The original technique involved the injection of highly concentrated urokinase directly into a clot through two crisscross catheters with multiple side holes. The current technique includes early fragmentation of residual clot with a balloon catheter, intrathrombic injection of heparin, mechanical treatment of a lysis-resistant clot at the arterial anastomosis, and routine administration of aspirin. After thrombolysis, underlying obstructions were treated with balloon angioplasty, atherectomy, or stents. The technical success, immediate clinical success, and frequency of complications for the entire population were analyzed. In addition, the results for 36 cases treated with the original technique were compared with the results for 37 recent cases treated with the current technique.
Of 284 cases considered suitable for treatment, thrombolysis was not done in eight cases because the venous anastomosis could not be crossed. Thrombolysis was discontinued in two cases because of extravasation of contrast material. The technical success for all grafts considered for treatment was 96%; 92% of treated grafts remained patent for at least 24 hr. Major complications occurred in 1% of cases, and minor complications occurred in 9% of cases. The clinical efficacies of the original and current techniques were 86% and 92%, respectively. The mean thrombolytic agent infusion time was reduced from 44 +/- 20 min to 23 +/- 13 min (p < .001). The overall procedure time for the recently treated subgroup was 67 +/- 26 min. There was no significant difference in the frequencies of major and minor complications between the treatment subgroups.
Pulse-spray pharmacomechanical thrombolysis is a reliable, rapid, and safe method for recanalization of occluded dialysis grafts. The current technique has been proven as safe and effective as the original technique but offers the advantage of a significant reduction in the time required for the infusion of thrombolytic agent.
脉冲喷射药物机械溶栓是一种用于治疗血管闭塞的不断发展的方法,即把高浓度的纤溶药物以高压喷雾的形式直接注入血栓。这项回顾性研究的目的是分析我们使用该技术治疗凝血的血液透析移植物的长期经验,并比较原始方法和当前方法的疗效与安全性。
在6年多的时间里,284例透析移植物血栓形成病例被认为适合采用脉冲喷射溶栓治疗。原始技术是通过两根带有多个侧孔的交叉导管将高浓度尿激酶直接注入血凝块。当前技术包括用球囊导管对残余血凝块进行早期破碎、在血栓内注射肝素、对动脉吻合处抗溶解的血凝块进行机械处理以及常规给予阿司匹林。溶栓后,对潜在的阻塞病变采用球囊血管成形术、旋切术或支架置入术进行治疗。分析了整个人群的技术成功率、即刻临床成功率及并发症发生率。此外,将采用原始技术治疗的36例结果与最近采用当前技术治疗的37例结果进行了比较。
在284例被认为适合治疗的病例中,有8例因无法穿过静脉吻合处而未进行溶栓治疗。有2例因造影剂外渗而停止溶栓。所有考虑进行治疗的移植物的技术成功率为96%;92%的治疗后移植物至少保持通畅24小时。主要并发症发生率为1%,次要并发症发生率为9%。原始技术和当前技术的临床有效率分别为86%和92%。溶栓药物平均输注时间从44±20分钟降至23±13分钟(p<0.001)。最近治疗的亚组的总体操作时间为67±26分钟。两个治疗亚组之间主要和次要并发症的发生率没有显著差异。
脉冲喷射药物机械溶栓是使闭塞的透析移植物再通的一种可靠、快速且安全的方法。当前技术已被证明与原始技术一样安全有效,但具有显著减少溶栓药物输注所需时间的优势。