Suppr超能文献

惊恐障碍中的肺功能:反对呼吸困难-恐惧理论的证据

Pulmonary function in panic disorder: evidence against the dyspnea-fear theory.

作者信息

Spinhoven P, Onstein E J, Sterk P J

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, University of Leiden, Oegstgeest, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 1995 May;33(4):457-60. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(94)00069-v.

Abstract

The present study addresses the hypothesis consistent with the dyspnea-fear theory of panic, that in a subgroup of panic patients a non-pathological pulmonary obstructive component may induce dyspnea, dyspneic fear and, ultimately, panic. In 38 patients who met DSM-III-R criteria for panic disorder, pulmonary function was assessed and various measurements for panic symptoms and concomitant psychopathology were collected. In comparison to patients with a high Forced Expiratory Flow at 50% (FEF 50%), low FEF 50% patients demonstrated significantly lower levels of Forced Expiratory Volume (first second) and Peak Expiratory Flow and significantly lower FEV1/FVC ratios. None of the differences on psychological measurements for symptom severity between low and high FEF 50% patients proved to be significant. Moreover, FEF 50% scores and FEV1/FVC ratios were not correlated to any of the measures for panic or associated psychopathology. It is concluded that the existence of a distinct subgroup of panic patients with signs of actual airway obstruction leading to uncontrollable dyspnea and fear of suffocation remains questionable.

摘要

本研究探讨了与惊恐障碍的呼吸困难-恐惧理论相一致的假说,即在一部分惊恐障碍患者中,非病理性的肺阻塞成分可能会引发呼吸困难、对呼吸困难的恐惧,并最终导致惊恐发作。对38名符合DSM-III-R惊恐障碍标准的患者进行了肺功能评估,并收集了有关惊恐症状及伴随的精神病理学的各项测量数据。与50%用力呼气流量(FEF 50%)较高的患者相比,FEF 50%较低的患者用力呼气量(第一秒)和呼气峰值流量水平显著更低,FEV1/FVC比值也显著更低。FEF 50%高低不同的患者在症状严重程度的心理测量指标上均未显示出显著差异。此外,FEF 50%得分和FEV1/FVC比值与任何惊恐或相关精神病理学指标均无相关性。研究得出结论,存在一个明显的惊恐障碍患者亚组,其具有实际气道阻塞迹象,导致无法控制的呼吸困难和窒息恐惧,这一结论仍值得怀疑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验