Sanzone A G, Torres H, Doundoulakis S H
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Health Sciences, Chicago Medical School, Mt Sinai Hospital Medical Center, IL 60608, USA.
Am J Emerg Med. 1995 May;13(3):327-30. doi: 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90212-0.
Carotid artery dissection is a rare occurrence in the trauma patient. Two cases of blunt trauma resulting in carotid artery dissection are reported. Initial recognition by clinicians is often difficult because of the diverse clinical manifestations, the delay in presentation, and the associated multi-organ system injuries that accompany carotid artery dissection. Because the diagnosis of carotid injury is rarely suspected in patients with neurological deficits, the first diagnostic test performed is usually computed tomography (CT) of the head. Angiography should be strongly considered when the following occur: (a) Neurologic deficits are incompatible with CT findings; (b) there is monoparesis or hemiparesis with a normal mental status examination; (c) there is severe cervical trauma with an abnormal neurological exam; or (d) a basilar skull fracture is present in a patient with an abnormal mental status exam. Once diagnosed, the management of carotid artery dissection is complex and no generalized guidelines have been established.
颈动脉夹层在创伤患者中较为罕见。本文报告了两例因钝性创伤导致颈动脉夹层的病例。由于临床表现多样、就诊延迟以及颈动脉夹层常伴有多器官系统损伤,临床医生往往难以早期识别。由于神经功能缺损患者很少被怀疑存在颈动脉损伤,因此通常首先进行的诊断性检查是头部计算机断层扫描(CT)。出现以下情况时,应强烈考虑进行血管造影:(a)神经功能缺损与CT检查结果不符;(b)精神状态检查正常但存在单瘫或偏瘫;(c)严重颈部创伤且神经检查异常;或(d)精神状态检查异常的患者存在颅底骨折。一旦确诊,颈动脉夹层的治疗较为复杂,目前尚未建立通用的指导原则。