• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有症状颈动脉分叉病变前瞻性随机试验的现状

Current status of the prospective, randomized trials of symptomatic carotid bifurcation disease.

作者信息

Ferguson G G

机构信息

Department of Clinical Neurological Science, University of Western Ontario, London, Canada.

出版信息

Semin Vasc Surg. 1995 Mar;8(1):46-54.

PMID:7757274
Abstract

Three contemporary trials that are studying patients who have symptomatic carotid disease have proven beyond doubt that CE is extremely beneficial in reducing the risk of future stroke in patients with high-grade stenosis (greater than 70%). The relative risk of major stroke is reduced by at least 80% at 2 years of follow-up. That such a remarkably positive result for surgery was not predicted is a consequence of the unanticipated malignant natural history of TIAs and minor stroke in severe carotid disease. Previous epidemiological studies had underestimated the risk of future stroke by almost threefold. The current studies also highlight the remarkable power of prospective clinical trials to evaluate the effectiveness of a surgical procedure. In the case of NASCET, only 659 patients were required to prove the benefit of CE, whereas, innumerable previous anecdotal cases had failed to provide a convincing answer. However it must be remembered that the benefit from CE is dependent on a low rate of perioperative morbidity and mortality, a strict measure of the degree of stenosis on angiography, recency of ischemic events, and unequivocal carotid symptoms. The ongoing study of patients with moderate degrees of carotid stenosis holds the promise that in the very near future precise guidelines, which have been properly evaluated by careful scientific scrutiny,, will be available to guide surgeons in the proper management of all patients who present with symptomatic carotid disease.

摘要

三项针对有症状颈动脉疾病患者的当代试验已毫无疑问地证明,颈动脉内膜切除术(CE)对于降低重度狭窄(大于70%)患者未来中风风险极为有益。在2年的随访中,严重中风的相对风险至少降低了80%。手术取得如此显著的积极结果却未被预先预测到,这是由于严重颈动脉疾病中短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)和轻微中风意外的恶性自然病程所致。先前的流行病学研究几乎将未来中风风险低估了三倍。当前的研究还凸显了前瞻性临床试验在评估手术程序有效性方面的强大作用。以北美症状性颈动脉内膜切除术试验(NASCET)为例,仅需659名患者就能证明CE的益处,而此前无数的个案却未能给出令人信服的答案。然而必须记住,CE的益处取决于围手术期低发病率和死亡率、血管造影对狭窄程度的严格测量、缺血事件的近期性以及明确的颈动脉症状。正在进行的针对中度颈动脉狭窄患者的研究有望在不久的将来提供经过仔细科学审查而恰当评估的精确指南,以指导外科医生妥善处理所有有症状颈动脉疾病患者。

相似文献

1
Current status of the prospective, randomized trials of symptomatic carotid bifurcation disease.有症状颈动脉分叉病变前瞻性随机试验的现状
Semin Vasc Surg. 1995 Mar;8(1):46-54.
2
Endarterectomy for preventing stroke in symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis. Review of clinical trials and recommendations for surgical therapy.症状性和无症状性颈动脉狭窄的内膜切除术预防卒中。临床试验综述及手术治疗建议。
Heart Surg Forum. 1999;2(2):147-68.
3
Carotid endarterectomy.
Health Technol Assess Rep. 1990(5):1-15.
4
Carotid endarterectomy for prevention of stroke.颈动脉内膜切除术预防中风。
West J Med. 1993 Jul;159(1):37-43.
5
[Natural history and indications for surgery in carotid stenosis].[颈动脉狭窄的自然史及手术指征]
Zentralbl Chir. 2000;125(3):221-7.
6
The evidence for medicine versus surgery for carotid stenosis.治疗颈动脉狭窄采用药物治疗与手术治疗的证据。
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Oct;60(1):3-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.05.021. Epub 2006 Aug 21.
7
Symptomatic carotid artery disease: current management recommendations.
Am Fam Physician. 1993 Nov 1;48(6):1059-66.
8
[Endarterectomy in asymptomatic carotid stenosis: a controversial procedure for primary prevention of stroke].无症状性颈动脉狭窄的内膜切除术:一种用于中风一级预防的有争议的手术
Recenti Prog Med. 2001 Jul-Aug;92(7-8):477-82.
9
Reducing the risk of stroke: identifying patients to refer for carotid endarterectomy.降低中风风险:识别适合接受颈动脉内膜切除术的患者以便转诊。
Geriatrics. 1991 Sep;46(9):22-6.
10
Guidelines for carotid endarterectomy. A multidisciplinary consensus statement from the Ad Hoc Committee, American Heart Association.颈动脉内膜切除术指南。美国心脏协会特设委员会的多学科共识声明。
Circulation. 1995 Jan 15;91(2):566-79. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.91.2.566.