• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染患者的药物经济学

Pharmacoeconomics of piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.

作者信息

Jhee S S, Gill M A, Yellin A E, Berne T V, Heseltine P N, Appleman M D

机构信息

Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, USA.

出版信息

Clin Ther. 1995 Jan-Feb;17(1):126-35. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80013-1.

DOI:10.1016/0149-2918(95)80013-1
PMID:7758055
Abstract

Costs involved in using piperacillin 4 g/tazobactam 500 mg, given as intermittent intravenous infusions every 8 hours, were compared with those for imipenem/cilastatin 500 mg, given as intermittent intravenous infusions every 6 hours, for the treatment of patients with gangrenous or perforated appendicitis. A total of 88 patients were included in our cost analyses: 42 patients in the piperacillin/tazobactam group and 46 patients in the imipenem/cilastatin group. Durations (mean +/- SD) of antibiotic therapies were 7.8 +/- 3.3 days and 7.1 +/- 2.6 days for the piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem/cilastatin groups, respectively. No statistical significance was found for the difference in duration of therapy (P = 0.376). Total drug treatment costs were $538.83 +/- $385.33 for the piperacillin/tazobactam group and $687.66 +/- $345.37 for the imipenem/cilastatin group. This difference in treatment cost was statistically significant (P = 0.0001). The need for laboratory tests and the use of other medications were not different between the two groups. Total hospital-days charges were higher for the piperacillin/tazobactam group ($18,339.76 +/- $6090.38) compared with the imipenem/cilastatin group ($16,150.00 +/- $5088.60) (P = 0.052). These findings suggest that length of hospital stay should be the economic focus of antibiotic therapy.

摘要

将哌拉西林4g/他唑巴坦500mg每8小时一次静脉滴注用于治疗坏疽性或穿孔性阑尾炎患者的费用,与亚胺培南/西司他丁500mg每6小时一次静脉滴注的费用进行了比较。共有88例患者纳入我们的成本分析:哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组42例患者,亚胺培南/西司他丁组46例患者。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组和亚胺培南/西司他丁组抗生素治疗的持续时间(均值±标准差)分别为7.8±3.3天和7.1±2.6天。治疗持续时间的差异无统计学意义(P = 0.376)。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组的总药物治疗费用为538.83美元±385.33美元,亚胺培南/西司他丁组为687.66美元±345.37美元。治疗费用的这种差异具有统计学意义(P = 0.0001)。两组间实验室检查需求和其他药物的使用情况无差异。哌拉西林/他唑巴坦组的总住院日费用(18,339.76美元±6090.38美元)高于亚胺培南/西司他丁组(16,150.00美元±5088.60美元)(P = 0.052)。这些发现表明住院时间应是抗生素治疗的经济关注点。

相似文献

1
Pharmacoeconomics of piperacillin/tazobactam and imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染患者的药物经济学
Clin Ther. 1995 Jan-Feb;17(1):126-35. doi: 10.1016/0149-2918(95)80013-1.
2
Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.他唑巴坦/哌拉西林与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001 Jan;19(1):79-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119010-00006.
3
Randomized comparison of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infection.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染患者的随机对照比较
Asian J Surg. 2004 Jul;27(3):227-35. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60039-7.
4
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Mar;176(3):255-61.
5
A randomized multicenter trial of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Swedish Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗严重腹腔内感染的随机多中心试验。瑞典研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jan;31 Suppl A:79-85. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_a.79.
6
Cost-minimization analysis of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin for the treatment of serious infections: a Canadian hospital perspective.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗严重感染的成本最小化分析:加拿大一家医院的视角
Ann Pharmacother. 1999 Feb;33(2):156-62. doi: 10.1345/aph.17366.
7
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Dec;36(12):2766-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.12.2766.
8
Imipenem/cilastatin versus piperacillin/tazobactam plus amikacin for empirical therapy in febrile neutropenic patients: results of the COSTINE study.亚胺培南/西司他丁与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦加阿米卡星用于发热性中性粒细胞减少患者的经验性治疗:COSTINE研究结果
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 May;21(5):645-55. doi: 10.1185/030079905X43631.
9
Piperacillin 2 g/tazobactam 0.5 g is as effective as imipenem 0.5 g/cilastatin 0.5 g for the treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis and complicated urinary tract infections.哌拉西林2克/他唑巴坦0.5克在治疗急性非复杂性肾盂肾炎和复杂性尿路感染方面与亚胺培南0.5克/西司他丁0.5克疗效相当。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Feb;19(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00481-2.
10
Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.亚胺培南-西司他丁与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦用于医院获得性肺炎或腹膜炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Nov;42(11):2966-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.11.2966.

引用本文的文献

1
Carbapenems versus other beta-lactams in treating severe infections in intensive care: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials.碳青霉烯类药物与其他β-内酰胺类药物治疗重症监护病房严重感染的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Jul;27(7):531-43. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0472-z. Epub 2008 Mar 29.
2
Piperacillin/tazobactam: a pharmacoeconomic review of its use in moderate to severe bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦:对其用于中重度细菌感染的药物经济学综述
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(11):1135-75. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119110-00006.
3
Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.
他唑巴坦/哌拉西林与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001 Jan;19(1):79-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119010-00006.
4
Cost effectiveness of ciprofloxacin plus metronidazole versus imipenem-cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.环丙沙星加甲硝唑与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Nov;16(5 Pt 2):551-61. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916050-00011.
5
Piperacillin/tazobactam: an updated review of its use in the treatment of bacterial infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦:其在治疗细菌感染中的应用最新综述
Drugs. 1999 May;57(5):805-43. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199957050-00017.
6
Monobactams and carbapenems for treatment of intraabdominal infections.用于治疗腹腔内感染的单环β-内酰胺类抗生素和碳青霉烯类抗生素。
Infection. 1999 Mar-Apr;27(2):136-47. doi: 10.1007/BF02560517.
7
Imipenem/cilastatin: an update of its antibacterial activity, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of serious infections.亚胺培南/西司他丁:其抗菌活性、药代动力学及治疗严重感染疗效的最新进展
Drugs. 1996 Jan;51(1):99-136. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199651010-00008.