• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较。

Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

作者信息

Brismar B, Malmborg A S, Tunevall G, Wretlind B, Bergman L, Mentzing L O, Nyström P O, Kihlström E, Bäckstrand B, Skau T

机构信息

Huddinge Hospital, Sweden.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Dec;36(12):2766-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.12.2766.

DOI:10.1128/AAC.36.12.2766
PMID:1336347
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC245542/
Abstract

In order to compare the clinical and microbiological efficacies and safety of piperacillin plus tazobactam with those of imipenem plus cilastatin, 134 patients with intra-abdominal infections (73 patients with appendicitis) participated in an open randomized comparative multicenter trial. A total of 40 men and 29 women (mean age, 53 years; age range, 18 to 92 years) were enrolled in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 40 men and 25 women (mean age, 54 years; age range, 16 to 91 years) were enrolled in the imipenem-cilastatin group. The patients received either piperacillin (4 g) and tazobactam (500 mg) every 8 h or imipenem and cilastatin (500 mg each) every 8 h. Both regimens were given by intravenous infusion. A total of 113 patients were clinically evaluable. Of 55 patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam, 50 were clinically cured, while 40 of 58 patients in the imipenem-cilastatin group were clinically cured. The differences were significant (Wilcoxon test; P = 0.005). There were 4 failures or relapses in the piperacillin-tazobactam group and 18 failures or relapses in the imipenem-cilastatin group. The microorganisms isolated were eradicated in similar proportions in the two patient groups. Adverse reactions, mainly gastrointestinal disturbances and nausea, were noted in 13 patients who received piperacillin-tazobactam and in 14 patients who received imipenem-cilastatin. Results of the present study show that piperacillin-tazobactam is effective and safe for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.

摘要

为比较哌拉西林加他唑巴坦与亚胺培南加西司他丁的临床、微生物学疗效及安全性,134例腹腔内感染患者(73例阑尾炎患者)参与了一项开放性随机对照多中心试验。哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦组共纳入40例男性和29例女性(平均年龄53岁;年龄范围18至92岁),亚胺培南 - 西司他丁组共纳入40例男性和25例女性(平均年龄54岁;年龄范围16至91岁)。患者每8小时接受一次哌拉西林(4g)和他唑巴坦(500mg)或亚胺培南和西司他丁(各500mg)静脉输注。共有113例患者可进行临床评估。接受哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦治疗的55例患者中,50例临床治愈,而亚胺培南 - 西司他丁组58例患者中有40例临床治愈。差异具有统计学意义(Wilcoxon检验;P = 0.005)。哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦组有4例治疗失败或复发,亚胺培南 - 西司他丁组有18例治疗失败或复发。两组患者分离出的微生物被根除的比例相似。接受哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦治疗的13例患者和接受亚胺培南 - 西司他丁治疗的14例患者出现了不良反应,主要为胃肠道不适和恶心。本研究结果表明,哌拉西林 - 他唑巴坦治疗腹腔内感染有效且安全。

相似文献

1
Piperacillin-tazobactam versus imipenem-cilastatin for treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与亚胺培南-西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1992 Dec;36(12):2766-73. doi: 10.1128/AAC.36.12.2766.
2
A randomized multicenter trial of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections. Swedish Study Group.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗严重腹腔内感染的随机多中心试验。瑞典研究小组。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1993 Jan;31 Suppl A:79-85. doi: 10.1093/jac/31.suppl_a.79.
3
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较。
Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1993 Mar;176(3):255-61.
4
Piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin for severe diabetic foot infections: a prospective, randomized clinical trial in a university hospital.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗严重糖尿病足感染:大学医院的一项前瞻性、随机临床试验。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2010 Aug;16(8):1252-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2009.03067.x. Epub 2009 Oct 14.
5
Piperacillin 2 g/tazobactam 0.5 g is as effective as imipenem 0.5 g/cilastatin 0.5 g for the treatment of acute uncomplicated pyelonephritis and complicated urinary tract infections.哌拉西林2克/他唑巴坦0.5克在治疗急性非复杂性肾盂肾炎和复杂性尿路感染方面与亚胺培南0.5克/西司他丁0.5克疗效相当。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2002 Feb;19(2):95-103. doi: 10.1016/s0924-8579(01)00481-2.
6
Randomized comparison of piperacillin/tazobactam versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of patients with intra-abdominal infection.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染患者的随机对照比较
Asian J Surg. 2004 Jul;27(3):227-35. doi: 10.1016/S1015-9584(09)60039-7.
7
Cost efficacy of tazobactam/piperacillin versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infection.他唑巴坦/哌拉西林与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的成本效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001 Jan;19(1):79-94. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119010-00006.
8
Meropenem versus imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intra-abdominal infections.美罗培南与亚胺培南/西司他丁治疗腹腔内感染的比较
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1995 Jan;35(1):139-48. doi: 10.1093/jac/35.1.139.
9
Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.亚胺培南-西司他丁与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦用于医院获得性肺炎或腹膜炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Nov;42(11):2966-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.11.2966.
10
The treatment of severe intra-abdominal infections: the role of piperacillin/tazobactam.严重腹腔内感染的治疗:哌拉西林/他唑巴坦的作用
Intensive Care Med. 1994 Jul;20 Suppl 3:S35-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01745249.

引用本文的文献

1
Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients.重症患者抗生素处方指南
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Aug;28(Suppl 2):S104-S216. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24677. Epub 2024 Aug 10.
2
Contradictory Recommendation in the Guideline for Antibiotic Prescription.抗生素处方指南中的相互矛盾的建议。
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2024 Jul;28(7):713-714. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24736.
3
Carbapenem Antibiotics Versus Other Antibiotics for Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: a Systematic Review and Patient-Level Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (PROSPERO CRD42018108854).碳青霉烯类抗生素与其他抗生素治疗复杂性腹腔内感染的比较:系统评价和随机对照试验的患者水平荟萃分析 (PROSPERO CRD42018108854)。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Jun;27(6):1208-1215. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05651-7. Epub 2023 Mar 22.
4
The efficacy and safety of eravacycline compared with current clinically common antibiotics in the treatment of adults with complicated intra-abdominal infections: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.与目前临床常用抗生素相比,依拉环素治疗成人复杂性腹腔内感染的疗效和安全性:一项贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Sep 16;9:935343. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.935343. eCollection 2022.
5
Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of High-Dose Piperacillin-Tazobactam in Obese Patients.哌拉西林他唑巴坦高剂量在肥胖患者中的药代动力学和药效学。
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 2021 May;46(3):385-394. doi: 10.1007/s13318-021-00677-1. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
6
Carbapenems vs β-Lactam Monotherapy or Combination Therapy for the Treatment of Complicated Intra-abdominal Infections: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.碳青霉烯类药物与β-内酰胺类单药治疗或联合治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019 Sep 9;6(10):ofz394. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofz394. eCollection 2019 Oct.
7
Guidelines for Antibiotic Prescription in Intensive Care Unit.重症监护病房抗生素处方指南
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2019 Jan;23(Suppl 1):S1-S63. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23101.
8
Co-administration of vancomycin and piperacillin-tazobactam is associated with increased renal dysfunction in adult and pediatric burn patients.万古霉素和哌拉西林他唑巴坦联合使用与成人和儿童烧伤患者肾功能障碍增加有关。
Crit Care. 2017 Dec 20;21(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13054-017-1899-3.
9
Study of the comparative activity of piperacillin/tazobactam with currently available antibiotics against 8206 aerobic isolates.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦与现有抗生素对8206株需氧菌分离株的比较活性研究。
Can J Infect Dis. 1997 May;8(3):147-53. doi: 10.1155/1997/632673.
10
Cross-Canada survey of resistance of 2747 aerobic blood culture isolates to piperacillin/tazobactam and other antibiotics.对2747株需氧血培养分离株对哌拉西林/他唑巴坦及其他抗生素耐药性的全加拿大调查。
Can J Infect Dis. 1998 Jan;9(1):33-44. doi: 10.1155/1998/730838.

本文引用的文献

1
Piperacillin sodium: antibacterial spectrum, pharmacokinetics, clinical efficacy, and adverse reactions.哌拉西林钠:抗菌谱、药代动力学、临床疗效及不良反应。
Pharmacotherapy. 1982 Nov-Dec;2(6):287-99. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.1982.tb03202.x.
2
Comparative activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors YTR 830, sodium clavulanate, and sulbactam combined with amoxicillin or ampicillin.β-内酰胺酶抑制剂YTR 830、克拉维酸钠和舒巴坦与阿莫西林或氨苄西林联合使用的比较活性。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1984 Oct;26(4):580-2. doi: 10.1128/AAC.26.4.580.
3
Imipenem/cilastatin in the treatment of intraabdominal infections: a review of worldwide experience.
Rev Infect Dis. 1985 Jul-Aug;7 Suppl 3:S518-21. doi: 10.1093/clinids/7.supplement_3.s518.
4
Randomized trial of imipenem/cilastatin versus gentamicin and clindamycin in mixed flora infections.亚胺培南/西司他丁与庆大霉素及克林霉素治疗混合菌群感染的随机试验
Am J Med. 1985 Jun 7;78(6A):85-91. doi: 10.1016/0002-9343(85)90106-8.
5
Imipenem (N-F-thienamycin) versus netilmicin plus clindamycin. A controlled and randomized comparison in intra-abdominal infections.亚胺培南(N-F-硫霉素)与奈替米星加克林霉素治疗腹腔内感染的对照随机比较
Ann Surg. 1987 Mar;205(3):271-5. doi: 10.1097/00000658-198703000-00009.
6
Imipenem/cilastatin: a multicentre international study of its clinical efficacy, safety and potential as empirical therapy.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1986 Dec;18 Suppl E:185-91. doi: 10.1093/jac/18.supplement_e.185.
7
Prospective study comparing imipenem-cilastatin with clindamycin and gentamicin for the treatment of serious surgical infections.比较亚胺培南-西司他丁与克林霉素及庆大霉素治疗严重外科感染的前瞻性研究。
Arch Surg. 1988 Mar;123(3):322-6. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1988.01400270056008.
8
Comparative activities of the beta-lactamase inhibitors YTR 830, clavulanate, and sulbactam combined with ampicillin and broad-spectrum penicillins against defined beta-lactamase-producing aerobic gram-negative bacilli.β-内酰胺酶抑制剂YTR 830、克拉维酸和舒巴坦与氨苄西林及广谱青霉素联合应用对特定产β-内酰胺酶需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌的比较活性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jun;29(6):980-5. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.6.980.
9
Comparative evaluation of a new beta-lactamase inhibitor, YTR 830, combined with different beta-lactam antibiotics against bacteria harboring known beta-lactamases.新型β-内酰胺酶抑制剂YTR 830与不同β-内酰胺类抗生素联合应用对携带已知β-内酰胺酶细菌的比较评价。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 May;29(5):955-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.29.5.955.
10
Comparison of the safety and efficacy of parenteral ticarcillin/clavulanate and clindamycin/gentamicin in serious intra-abdominal infections.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 1989 Nov;24 Suppl B:147-56. doi: 10.1093/jac/24.suppl_b.147.