Meng F, Hoversten M T, Thompson R C, Taylor L, Watson S J, Akil H
Mental Health Research Institute, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor 48109, USA.
J Biol Chem. 1995 May 26;270(21):12730-6. doi: 10.1074/jbc.270.21.12730.
Within the large family of G-protein-coupled receptors, a picture is emerging which contrasts the binding of small ligands and the binding of peptides to the seven-helix configuration of the proteins. Because of its unique richness in both peptide and non-peptide ligands, the opioid receptor family offers several advantages for achieving a better understanding of similarities and differences in ligand/receptor interactions across different classes of agonists and antagonists. Since multiple, naturally occurring, ligands interact with the multiple receptors with varying degrees of selectivity, this family is also an excellent model for examining the structural basis of selectivity. Thus, the molecular basis of binding affinity and selectivity of the kappa and the delta opioid receptors was investigated by the construction of four kappa/delta chimeric receptors. The pharmacological profiles of these chimeras as well as those of the wild type kappa and delta receptors were determined by their binding with several different categories of opioid ligands. A linear model was used to deduce the relative contribution of each corresponding pairs of kappa-delta receptor segments to the binding of a given ligand. The results show that the kappa and delta receptors bind the same opioid core differently and achieve their selectivity through different mechanisms. In addition, the interaction of a peptide ligand with a receptor appears to be different from that of a small ligand. Furthermore, these results point to a particularly important role of the second extracellular loop and the top half of transmembrane domain 4 in the binding of prodynorphin products. Together, the results suggest that these peptide receptors can be bound and activated via multiple binding pockets as a function of their own topography and the nature of the interacting ligand.
在G蛋白偶联受体的大家族中,一幅图景正在浮现,它对比了小分子配体的结合以及肽与蛋白质七螺旋结构的结合。由于阿片受体家族在肽类和非肽类配体方面都具有独特的丰富性,因此它为更好地理解不同类别的激动剂和拮抗剂之间配体/受体相互作用的异同提供了几个优势。由于多种天然存在的配体以不同程度的选择性与多种受体相互作用,这个家族也是研究选择性结构基础的一个极佳模型。因此,通过构建四种κ/δ嵌合受体,研究了κ和δ阿片受体结合亲和力和选择性的分子基础。这些嵌合体以及野生型κ和δ受体的药理学特性是通过它们与几种不同类别的阿片配体的结合来确定的。使用线性模型来推断κ-δ受体片段的每对相应片段对给定配体结合的相对贡献。结果表明,κ和δ受体以不同方式结合相同的阿片核心,并通过不同机制实现其选择性。此外,肽配体与受体的相互作用似乎与小分子配体不同。此外,这些结果表明第二细胞外环和跨膜结构域4的上半部分在强啡肽原产物的结合中起着特别重要的作用。总之,结果表明这些肽受体可以通过多个结合口袋结合并激活,这取决于它们自身的拓扑结构和相互作用配体的性质。