Monsein L H, Razumovsky A Y, Ackerman S J, Nauta H J, Hanley D F
Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
J Neurosurg. 1995 Jun;82(6):972-5. doi: 10.3171/jns.1995.82.6.0972.
Vessel identification during a transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound examination is usually based on well-established inferential criteria without confirmation by imaging. Part of a routine study involves taking measurements from the M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and the A1 segment of the anterior cerebral artery (ACA) at the points of maximum mean linear blood flow velocity (LBFV). The authors tested the hypothesis that insonation is from the midpoints of the M1 and A1 segments during clinical TCD examinations. Conventional hand-held TCD examinations were performed on five volunteers. The points of maximum mean LBFV of the M1 and A1 segments of the MCA and ACA were located. Measurements were also taken from the midpoints of the M1 and A1 segments using a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging-guided stereotactic TCD technique. Values for depths of insonation and maximum mean LBFV obtained with the two techniques were compared. There was no significant difference between the two techniques for the measured values of depth of insonation of either the individual vessels (p > 0.11) or the aggregate (p = 0.46). There was a significant difference between the aggregate maximum mean LBFV measurements (p = 0.0022). The hand-held technique systematically produced higher maximum mean LBFV than the MR-guided stereotactic technique. The authors conclude that when using traditional criteria for TCD examination of the ACA and MCA, the points of insonation approximate the middle of the A1 and M1 segments.
经颅多普勒(TCD)超声检查期间的血管识别通常基于既定的推断标准,无需影像学确认。常规研究的一部分包括在平均线性血流速度(LBFV)最大值点处测量大脑中动脉(MCA)的M1段和大脑前动脉(ACA)的A1段。作者检验了在临床TCD检查期间,超声探测部位为M1和A1段中点的假设。对五名志愿者进行了传统的手持式TCD检查。确定了MCA和ACA的M1和A1段的最大平均LBFV点。还使用磁共振(MR)成像引导的立体定向TCD技术从M1和A1段的中点进行了测量。比较了两种技术获得的超声探测深度值和最大平均LBFV。对于单个血管或总体的超声探测深度测量值,两种技术之间没有显著差异(p>0.11)或(p = 0.46)。总体最大平均LBFV测量值之间存在显著差异(p = 0.0022)。手持式技术系统性地产生比MR引导的立体定向技术更高的最大平均LBFV。作者得出结论,当使用传统标准对ACA和MCA进行TCD检查时,超声探测部位接近A1和M1段的中点。