Sheehan T J, Fifield J, Reisine S, Tennen H
Department of Community Medicine, University of Connecticut Health Center, USA.
J Pers Assess. 1995 Jun;64(3):507-21. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6403_9.
This study examined the temporal stability of the measurement structure of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D; Radloff, 1977) in 813 individuals with rheumatoid arthritis. Participants completed the CES-D (Radloff, 1977) on three occasions 1 year apart. Structural equation models and polyserial correlations were used to address methodological limitations of previous studies. Four competing measurement structures were tested with one factor, three factors, four factors, and a single second-order factor underlying the four-factor model. The four-factor and the second-order-factor models provided the best fit at Time 1. When cross-validated at Times 2 and 3, the four-factor and the second-order-factor models remained invariant. Researchers can now more confidently use the CES-D to examine how distress changes in chronic physical disorders.
本研究考察了流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D;拉德洛夫,1977)测量结构在813名类风湿性关节炎患者中的时间稳定性。参与者在相隔1年的三个时间点完成了CES-D(拉德洛夫,1977)。采用结构方程模型和多系列相关分析来解决以往研究中的方法学局限性。对四种竞争的测量结构进行了测试,分别为一个因子模型、三个因子模型、四个因子模型以及四个因子模型下的单一二阶因子模型。四因子模型和二阶因子模型在时间1时拟合最佳。在时间2和时间3进行交叉验证时,四因子模型和二阶因子模型保持不变。研究人员现在可以更有信心地使用CES-D来研究慢性身体疾病中痛苦是如何变化的。