Suppr超能文献

黎巴嫩亚美尼亚族人群中亚美尼亚流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)的效度验证

Validation of the Armenian Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) among ethnic Armenians in Lebanon.

作者信息

Kazarian Shahe S

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioural Sciences, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107-2020, Lebanon.

出版信息

Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2009 Sep;55(5):442-8. doi: 10.1177/0020764008100548.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The aim of this paper is to report on the Armenian version of the 20-item Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (Armenian CES-D) and its validity and reliability when administered to a community sample of ethnic Armenians in Lebanon.

METHOD

A total of 172 participants completed the Armenian CES-D Scale, the Mood Rating Scale, the Armenian Psychological Well-Being Scale and the General Family Functioning Scale. The factor structure and internal consistency of the Armenian CES-D and its correlation with the remaining measures were evaluated.

RESULTS

Two factors correlating r = 0.34 with each other were obtained. The depression factor comprised 16 psychological, somatic and interpersonal expressions of depressive symptoms and correlated r = 0.97 with Armenian CES-D scores. The well-being factor comprised four positive expressions of affect and correlated r = 0.34 with Armenian CES-D scores. Depression scores correlated r = -0.39 with psychological well-being scores, r = -0.34 with mood ratings and r = -0.23 with family functioning scores; the comparable correlations for well-being scores were r = -0.46, r = -0.41, and r = -0.33, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The Armenian CES-D is likely measuring two distinct aspects of mental health, depression and well-being, and the depression factor may be as adequate in measuring the Armenian depressed mind as the 20-item Armenian CES-D Scale.

摘要

背景

本文旨在报告20项流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(亚美尼亚版CES-D),以及将其应用于黎巴嫩亚美尼亚族社区样本时的有效性和可靠性。

方法

共有172名参与者完成了亚美尼亚版CES-D量表、情绪评定量表、亚美尼亚心理健康量表和一般家庭功能量表。对亚美尼亚版CES-D的因子结构、内部一致性及其与其他测量方法的相关性进行了评估。

结果

得到了两个相互关联(r = 0.34)的因子。抑郁因子包括16种抑郁症状的心理、躯体和人际表现,与亚美尼亚版CES-D得分的相关性为r = 0.97。幸福感因子包括四种积极的情感表达,与亚美尼亚版CES-D得分的相关性为r = 0.34。抑郁得分与心理健康得分的相关性为r = -0.39,与情绪评定得分的相关性为r = -0.34,与家庭功能得分的相关性为r = -0.23;幸福感得分的可比相关性分别为r = -0.46、r = -0.41和r = -0.33。

结论

亚美尼亚版CES-D可能测量了心理健康的两个不同方面,即抑郁和幸福感,并且抑郁因子在测量亚美尼亚人的抑郁心理方面可能与20项亚美尼亚版CES-D量表一样有效。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验