Crawford C A, McDougall S A, Bardo M T
Department of Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506, USA.
Neuropharmacology. 1994 Dec;33(12):1559-65. doi: 10.1016/0028-3908(94)90130-9.
Ontogenetic differences in dopamine (DA) synthesis and metabolism were assessed in 17- and 90-day-old rats injected i.p. with the alkylating agent N-ethoxycarbonyl-2-ethoxy-1,2-dihydroquinoline (EEDQ) 24 hr prior to sacrifice. DA synthesis was determined by measuring DOPA accumulation after NSD-1015 induced inhibition of DOPA decarboxylase; whereas, DA turnover was estimated by measuring DA accumulation and DOPAC efflux after pargyline induced inhibition of monoamine oxidase. In addition, some of the rats were pretreated with the competitive D1 and D2 antagonists SCH 23390 (1.0 mg/kg) and sulpiride (100 mg/kg) in order to protect these receptor subtypes from EEDQ-induced inactivation. The latter procedure was used to determine whether EEDQ's presynaptic effects were mediated by D1 and D2 receptors or were nonspecific. The results showed that 7.5 mg/kg EEDQ increased the striatal DA synthesis of both preweanling and adult rats: effects eliminated if D1 and D2 receptors were protected by pretreatment with SCH 23390 and sulpiride. Striatal DA levels of both age groups were depressed by EEDQ treatment, while DA accumulation was unaffected. Age-dependent effects were apparent however, as 7.5 mg/kg EEDQ increased the DOPAC turnover of adult, but not 17-day-old rats. The inability of EEDQ to affect the DOPAC turnover of the younger rats was apparently not dose related, as 15 mg/kg EEDQ did not affect the striatal DOPAC turnover of 17-day-olds. In adult rats, the EEDQ-induced increase in DOPAC turnover was not mediated by DA receptors, as pretreatment with SCH 23390 and sulpiride did not block EEDQ's effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
在处死前24小时经腹腔注射烷基化剂N - 乙氧羰基 - 2 - 乙氧基 - 1,2 - 二氢喹啉(EEDQ),对17日龄和90日龄大鼠的多巴胺(DA)合成及代谢的个体发生差异进行评估。通过测量NSD - 1015诱导抑制多巴脱羧酶后多巴(DOPA)的积累来测定DA合成;而通过测量帕吉林诱导抑制单胺氧化酶后DA的积累和3,4 - 二羟基苯乙酸(DOPAC)流出量来估计DA周转率。此外,部分大鼠预先用竞争性D1和D2拮抗剂SCH 23390(1.0 mg/kg)和舒必利(100 mg/kg)进行预处理,以保护这些受体亚型免受EEDQ诱导的失活。后一程序用于确定EEDQ的突触前效应是由D1和D2受体介导还是非特异性的。结果显示,7.5 mg/kg EEDQ增加了断奶前和成年大鼠纹状体DA的合成:如果用SCH 23390和舒必利预处理保护D1和D2受体,此效应则消除。EEDQ处理使两个年龄组的纹状体DA水平降低,而DA积累不受影响。然而,年龄依赖性效应明显,因为7.5 mg/kg EEDQ增加了成年大鼠而非17日龄大鼠的DOPAC周转率。EEDQ无法影响幼龄大鼠的DOPAC周转率显然与剂量无关,因为15 mg/kg EEDQ未影响17日龄大鼠的纹状体DOPAC周转率。在成年大鼠中,EEDQ诱导的DOPAC周转率增加不是由DA受体介导的,因为用SCH 23390和舒必利预处理并未阻断EEDQ的作用。(摘要截短于250字)