Davis E T, Yager D, King R A, Kirkland B A
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta 30332-0170, USA.
Vision Res. 1995 Apr;35(8):1025-40. doi: 10.1016/0042-6989(94)00198-u.
We tested the predictions of a multiple-channels model about the appearance of spatial patterns. Specifically we tested how encoding the perceived spatial frequency of a near-threshold pattern compared with encoding of a zero-contrast or moderate-contrast pattern. For example, the model predicts that the mean perceived spatial frequency of a near-threshold pattern is a weighted average of the response to the stimulus and the noise. Six subjects used the method of adjustment procedure to match a peripherally viewed test stimulus (or a blank) with a foveally viewed grating. For near-threshold patterns we found a smooth perceived spatial-frequency function, with a smaller range of perceived spatial frequencies than obtained for 0.16 contrast patterns. These results are consistent with the predictions of the model: noise can affect the appearance of near-threshold and zero-contrast patterns.
