Suppr超能文献

A comparison of conventional culture and three rapid methods for the detection of Salmonella in poultry feeds and environmental samples.

作者信息

Quinn C, Ward J, Griffin M, Yearsley D, Egan J

机构信息

Veterinary Research Laboratory, Abbotstown, Castleknock, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Lett Appl Microbiol. 1995 Feb;20(2):89-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765x.1995.tb01293.x.

Abstract

Three rapid methods, an impedance method (Malthus 2000 Analyzer), a colorimetric DNA hybridization method (Gene-Trak) and a post-enrichment enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Salmonella-Tek) were compared with conventional culture for the detection of Salmonella in poultry feeds, and in fluff and dust samples from poultry housing. The percentage positive samples for Salmonella by each of the methods were 25.5% for conventional culture, 38.4% for the Malthus, 28.9% for the Gene-Trak and 28.5% for the Salmonella-Tek. By any method 60/153 (39.2%) of the samples tested were positive on confirmed culture.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验