Royston P, Thompson S G
Medical Statistics Unit, Royal Postgraduate Medical School, London, England.
Biometrics. 1995 Mar;51(1):114-27.
A method for comparing the fits of two non-nested models, based on a suggestion of Davidson and MacKinnon (1981), is developed in the context of linear and nonlinear regression with normal errors. Each model is regarded as a special case of an artificial "supermodel" and is obtained by restricting the value of a mixing parameter gamma to 0 or 1. To enable estimation and hypothesis testing for gamma, an approximate supermodel is used in which the fitted values from the individual models appear in place of the original parametrization. In the case of nested linear models, the proposed test essentially reproduces the standard F test. The calculations required are for the most part straight-forward (basically, linear regression through the origin). The test is extended to cover situations in which serious bias in the maximum likelihood estimate of gamma occurs, simple approximate bounds for the bias being given. Two real datasets are used illustratively throughout.
基于戴维森和麦金农(1981年)的一项建议,本文开发了一种在具有正态误差的线性和非线性回归背景下比较两个非嵌套模型拟合优度的方法。每个模型都被视为一个人工“超级模型”的特殊情况,并且通过将混合参数γ的值限制为0或1来获得。为了能够对γ进行估计和假设检验,使用了一个近似超级模型,其中各个模型的拟合值代替原始参数化出现。在嵌套线性模型的情况下,所提出的检验本质上重现了标准F检验。所需的计算大部分都很简单(基本上是通过原点的线性回归)。该检验被扩展到涵盖γ的最大似然估计出现严重偏差的情况,并给出了偏差的简单近似界限。在整个过程中使用了两个真实数据集进行说明。