Suppr超能文献

消旋肾上腺素与沙丁胺醇雾化吸入治疗急性细支气管炎的临床疗效

The clinical efficacy of nebulized racemic epinephrine and albuterol in acute bronchiolitis.

作者信息

Reijonen T, Korppi M, Pitkäkangas S, Tenhola S, Remes K

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Kuopio University Hospital, Finland.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1995 Jun;149(6):686-92. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.1995.02170190096017.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether nebulized racemic epinephrine or albuterol improves respiratory distress in infants with acute bronchiolitis.

DESIGN

A randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

SETTING

A university hospital providing primary hospital care for all pediatric patients in a defined area.

PATIENTS

One hundred consecutive infants younger than 24 months treated in the hospital for acute bronchiolitis.

INTERVENTION

The patients received two inhalations at 30-minute intervals: racemic epinephrine followed by physiologic saline (REP group; n = 24), albuterol followed by physiologic saline (AP group; n = 27), physiologic saline followed by racemic epinephrine (PRE group; n = 24), and physiologic saline followed by albuterol (PA group; n = 25). All patients received intramuscular epinephrine 60 minutes after the beginning of the study.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Oxygen saturation, respiratory rate, and two clinical scores were used: one based on wheezing and retractions (Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument) and the other based on changes in wheezing, retractions, and respiratory rate (Respiratory Assessment Change Score).

MAIN RESULTS

During the study, there were no significant differences among the four groups in clinical scores, oxygen saturations, and respiratory rates. Mean Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument scores improved significantly within the REP, PRE, and AP groups 15 minutes after the first inhalation. In only the REP group, which received racemic epinephrine, the confidence limits did not overlap. A comparison of paired data of each patient revealed that the difference in Respiratory Assessment Change Score was significant between racemic epinephrine and physiologic saline, but not between albuterol and physiologic saline. Intramuscular epinephrine significantly improved Respiratory Distress Assessment Index scores in those groups treated earlier with racemic epinephrine (REP and PRE groups). No significant adverse effects were seen in any group or at any phase of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Elimination of hypoxia by supplemental oxygen and moistening of inspired air relieve the symptoms of acute bronchiolitis. Nebulized racemic epinephrine and albuterol are safe and useful in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis. Improvements in symptom scores at 15 minutes favor the use of racemic epinephrine. As the action of epinephrine is short, the effect can be increased by repeated inhalations.

摘要

目的

研究雾化消旋肾上腺素或沙丁胺醇是否能改善急性细支气管炎婴儿的呼吸窘迫。

设计

一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲研究。

地点

为特定区域内所有儿科患者提供初级医院护理的大学医院。

患者

100名连续在医院接受急性细支气管炎治疗的24个月以下婴儿。

干预措施

患者每隔30分钟接受两次吸入治疗:消旋肾上腺素后接生理盐水(REP组;n = 24)、沙丁胺醇后接生理盐水(AP组;n = 27)、生理盐水后接消旋肾上腺素(PRE组;n = 24)、生理盐水后接沙丁胺醇(PA组;n = 25)。所有患者在研究开始60分钟后接受肌内注射肾上腺素。

主要观察指标

使用血氧饱和度、呼吸频率以及两个临床评分:一个基于哮鸣音和吸气凹陷(呼吸窘迫评估工具),另一个基于哮鸣音、吸气凹陷和呼吸频率的变化(呼吸评估变化评分)。

主要结果

在研究期间,四组在临床评分、血氧饱和度和呼吸频率方面无显著差异。在首次吸入后15分钟,REP组、PRE组和AP组的平均呼吸窘迫评估工具评分显著改善。仅在接受消旋肾上腺素的REP组中,置信区间没有重叠。对每位患者的配对数据进行比较显示,消旋肾上腺素与生理盐水之间的呼吸评估变化评分差异显著,而沙丁胺醇与生理盐水之间无显著差异。在早期接受消旋肾上腺素治疗的组(REP组和PRE组)中,肌内注射肾上腺素显著改善了呼吸窘迫评估指数评分。在研究的任何组或任何阶段均未观察到显著不良反应。

结论

通过补充氧气消除缺氧以及湿化吸入空气可缓解急性细支气管炎的症状。雾化消旋肾上腺素和沙丁胺醇在治疗急性细支气管炎方面安全且有效。15分钟时症状评分的改善有利于使用消旋肾上腺素。由于肾上腺素作用时间短,可通过重复吸入增加效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验