McKendry R J, Dale P
Division of Rheumatology, Ottawa General Hospital, Ontario.
Clin Invest Med. 1995 Feb;18(1):73-9.
We tested the hypothesis that small training programs (3 or fewer residents) lack the "critical mass" needed for an optimal learning experience, and thus graduates of small programs will have a lower pass rate on the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (RCPSC) certifying exams that graduates of large (10 or more residents) training programs. Pass rates on the RCPSC certifying exams (written and oral) were compared to the training program size for each of 6 years from 1984/85 to 1989/90 within 10 of the 43 RCPSC (sub)specialties selected by meeting predefined program size requirements. These 10 specialties met the size variation requirements needed to test the hypothesis: neurology, cardiology, emergency medicine, community medicine, neurosurgery, urology, plastic surgery, dermatology, anatomical pathology, and respiratory medicine. Of these, 3 specialties had a significantly lower written exam pass rate for candidates trained in small compared to large programs. The same 3 specialties (neurology, neurosurgery, and community medicine) had a higher proportion of International Medical Graduates (IMGs) in small training programs. The significantly lower pass rate of IMGs, compared to Canadian/USA graduates, accounted for a portion of the correlation of small program size with lower pass rates in these 3 specialties. By pooling the results from the 10 specialties evaluated, candidates from small (3 or fewer residents) training programs have slightly lower pass rates (11%) on written certification examinations compared to candidates from large (10 or more residents) training programs. This small but statistically significant effect on the pooled results was due to averaging of a more marked program size effect from 3 of the 10 specialties.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
小型培训项目(住院医师人数为3人或更少)缺乏实现最佳学习体验所需的“临界规模”,因此,小型项目的毕业生在加拿大皇家内科医师与外科医师学院(RCPSC)认证考试中的通过率将低于大型(住院医师人数为10人或更多)培训项目的毕业生。在RCPSC选定的43个(亚)专业中,有10个符合预先定义的项目规模要求,我们比较了1984/85年至1989/90年这6年中每年RCPSC认证考试(笔试和口试)的通过率与培训项目规模。这10个专业满足检验该假设所需的规模差异要求:神经病学、心脏病学、急诊医学、社区医学、神经外科、泌尿外科、整形外科、皮肤科、解剖病理学和呼吸医学。其中,与大型项目相比,3个专业中接受小型项目培训的考生笔试通过率显著较低。在小型培训项目中,同样这3个专业(神经病学、神经外科和社区医学)的国际医学毕业生(IMG)比例更高。与加拿大/美国毕业生相比,IMG的通过率显著较低,这在一定程度上解释了这3个专业中项目规模小与通过率低之间的相关性。通过汇总所评估的10个专业的结果,与来自大型(住院医师人数为10人或更多)培训项目的考生相比,来自小型(住院医师人数为3人或更少)培训项目的考生在书面认证考试中的通过率略低(11%)。对汇总结果的这种微小但具有统计学意义的影响是由于对10个专业中的3个专业更显著的项目规模效应进行了平均。(摘要截取自250字)