Tariq M, Syed N A, Motiwala A, Jafri W, Hameed K, Islam N, Riaz M, Awan S, Akhter J, Talati J
Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Educ Health (Abingdon). 2011 Dec;24(3):573. Epub 2011 Dec 4.
Medical education is a continuously evolving field. Training institutes and programs should have a process in place to gather continuous feedback and then make appropriate modifications in order to provide education and training effectively. Our study aimed to assess the effect of a quality improvement cycle approach in using various educational interventions within a residency. Effects were measured on the key educational outcomes of residents; medical knowledge, skills and professional attitudes using results of postgraduate examination with both written and clinical skills components.
A number of educational interventions were implemented which included changes in work hours with increased time for self-study, new educational activities including a Residents Hour, a Residents Slide Session, Grand Rounds and Journal Clubs, Clinico-pathological conferences, and a two- week postgraduate course for senior residents. Newer and improved assessment tools were also implemented, including an annual in-training mock exam based on the format of the postgraduate examination. Pass rates in postgraduate examinations (Fellow of College of Physicians and Surgeons exam and Member of Royal College of Physicians exam) were compared before and after the interventions to assess the effectiveness of the interventions.
The first group of residents after introduction of the educational interventions completed residency training in 2001. Postgraduate exam pass rates (sometimes after two or more attempts) were 59.2% (42 of 71 graduates) before 2001 and 86.4% (38 of 44 graduates after 2001 (p = 0.002). The number of candidates passing the examinations in either their first or second attempts before 2001 was 17 of 42 (40.5%), which increased to 33 of 38 (86.8%) after 2001 (p = <0.001).
Our study describes a number of interventions that were successful in bringing about an improvement in the performance of our residents. These can serve as a guide for postgraduate training programs, particularly those of Internal Medicine, in implementing strategies to strengthen training and enhance the performance of trainees.
医学教育是一个不断发展的领域。培训机构和课程应有一个流程来收集持续反馈,然后进行适当修改,以便有效地提供教育和培训。我们的研究旨在评估质量改进循环方法在住院医师培训中使用各种教育干预措施的效果。使用包含笔试和临床技能部分的研究生考试结果,对住院医师的关键教育成果(医学知识、技能和专业态度)进行了评估。
实施了多项教育干预措施,包括改变工作时间以增加自学时间,开展新的教育活动,如住院医师时间、住院医师幻灯片会议、大查房和期刊俱乐部、临床病理讨论会,以及为高年级住院医师开设的为期两周的研究生课程。还实施了更新和改进的评估工具,包括基于研究生考试形式的年度培训模拟考试。比较干预前后研究生考试(内科医师学会会员考试和皇家内科医师学院会员考试)的通过率,以评估干预措施的有效性。
引入教育干预措施后的第一批住院医师于2001年完成住院医师培训。2001年之前,研究生考试通过率(有时经过两次或更多次尝试)为59.2%(71名毕业生中的42名),2001年之后为86.4%(44名毕业生中的38名)(p = 0.002)。2001年之前首次或第二次通过考试的考生人数为42人中的17人(40.5%),2001年之后增加到38人中的33人(86.8%)(p = <0.001)。
我们的研究描述了一些成功提高住院医师表现的干预措施。这些措施可为研究生培训项目,尤其是内科培训项目,实施加强培训和提高学员表现的策略提供指导。