Miranda D R
Department of Surgery, University Hospital of Groningen, The Netherlands.
Chest. 1994 Aug;106(2):524-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.106.2.524.
This study evaluates the influence of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) on the components of quality of life (QOL) of patients after discharge from the hospital.
Extracted from a prospective national survey on Dutch intensive care units (ICUs).
Thirty-six ICUs of both university and nonuniversity hospitals, spread throughout the country.
For a period of 6 months, 9,803 consecutive ICU admissions entered the study. Outcome in connection with in-hospital CPR was analyzed by comparing the CPR group (n = 477) with a standardized control group without CPR (n = 500).
Activities of daily living were registered at the time of hospital admission. A record was kept of each patient for demographics, severity of illness, length of stay, daily use of manpower and ICU technology, and mortality. Six months after hospital discharge, the QOL of 69 patients in both the CPR and control groups was measured with the Sickness Impact Profile (SIP).
CPR was performed in 4.8 percent of the patients, mainly from the general ward. These patients were older, had a higher severity of illness, and a higher daily consumption of nursing resources. The QOL did not correlate with severity of illness on admission, length of stay, or consumption of resources in the ICU. On the whole, the SIP scores of both CPR and control groups did not differ much: 11.7 vs 10.7, and circulatory arrest did not appear to impair the self-sufficiency in the study group significantly in comparison with the controls. An increased dysfunction was found in the CPR group of patients concerning their work and their psychosocial functioning.
Patients who have recovered from a circulatory arrest after CPR resuscitation find their capacity for resuming work diminished after discharge from the hospital, while they seem to experience a postponed negative effect on their mental functioning, especially the functions connected with the awareness of their environment.
本研究评估心肺复苏(CPR)对出院后患者生活质量(QOL)各组成部分的影响。
从一项针对荷兰重症监护病房(ICU)的前瞻性全国性调查中提取数据。
分布在全国的36家大学医院和非大学医院的ICU。
在6个月的时间里,9803例连续入住ICU的患者进入研究。通过将心肺复苏组(n = 477)与无心肺复苏的标准化对照组(n = 500)进行比较,分析与院内心肺复苏相关的结果。
在入院时记录日常生活活动情况。记录每位患者的人口统计学信息、疾病严重程度、住院时间、每日人力和ICU技术使用情况以及死亡率。出院6个月后,使用疾病影响量表(SIP)对心肺复苏组和对照组的69例患者的生活质量进行测量。
4.8%的患者接受了心肺复苏,主要来自普通病房。这些患者年龄较大,疾病严重程度较高,每日护理资源消耗较多。生活质量与入院时的疾病严重程度、住院时间或ICU资源消耗无关。总体而言,心肺复苏组和对照组的SIP评分差异不大:分别为11.7和10.7,与对照组相比,循环骤停似乎并未显著损害研究组的自理能力。在心肺复苏组患者的工作和心理社会功能方面发现功能障碍增加。
心肺复苏复苏后从循环骤停中恢复的患者出院后恢复工作的能力下降,而他们似乎在心理功能上经历了延迟的负面影响,尤其是与对周围环境的感知相关的功能。