O'Sullivan A J, Ho K K
Garvan Institute of Medical Research, St. Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1995 Jun;80(6):1783-8. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.6.7775623.
Previous studies have shown that oral, but not transdermal, administration of estrogen stimulates GH secretion in postmenopausal women. Because GH impairs insulin action, the impact of estrogen replacement therapy on carbohydrate metabolism may be influenced by the route of administration. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the effects of oral and transdermal estrogen replacement on glucose tolerance and insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women. In an open label, randomized, cross-over study, nine postmenopausal women were randomized to transdermal estrogen patches (Estraderm-TTS 100) or oral conjugated estrogen (Premarin, 1.25 mg) daily for 12 weeks and then crossed over to receive the alternative treatment for a further 12 weeks. An oral glucose tolerance test and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp (HEC) were performed before treatment and at the end of 10 weeks of treatment. Oral and transdermal estrogen both significantly reduced LH to the same degree. Mean GH did not significantly change with transdermal estrogen, but rose significantly during oral estrogen therapy. Peak and mean glucose and insulin levels during the oral glucose tolerance test were not altered by estrogen therapy and were not significantly different between treatments. Mean glucose and insulin levels were maintained at an identical level during the HEC performed at pretreatment and during estrogen therapy. The mean glucose infusion rate required to maintain euglycemia during the HEC (mean +/- SEM, pretreatment, 40.4 +/- 4.8 mumol/kg.min) was unaltered by oral (39.8 +/- 4.6 mumol/kg.min) or transdermal estrogen treatment (42.1 +/- 4.2 mumol/kg.min). However, during the transdermal estrogen phase (60 +/- 10 mumol/L), the mean nonesterified free fatty acid concentration was suppressed to a significantly lower level during the HEC than during the oral estrogen phase (120 +/- 20 mumol/L; P < 0.05). We conclude that compared to the oral route, transdermal estrogen therapy is associated with a slight, but significant, improvement of insulin action on lipid metabolism. However, in the short term, the route of estrogen replacement therapy does not have a major impact on glucose metabolism in postmenopausal women.
既往研究表明,口服而非经皮给予雌激素可刺激绝经后女性的生长激素(GH)分泌。由于GH会损害胰岛素作用,雌激素替代疗法对碳水化合物代谢的影响可能受给药途径的影响。本研究的目的是前瞻性比较口服和经皮雌激素替代疗法对绝经后女性葡萄糖耐量和胰岛素敏感性的影响。在一项开放标签、随机、交叉研究中,9名绝经后女性被随机分为每日接受经皮雌激素贴片(雌二醇透皮贴剂100)或口服结合雌激素(倍美力,1.25毫克)治疗12周,然后交叉接受另一种治疗再持续12周。在治疗前及治疗10周结束时进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验和高胰岛素正常血糖钳夹试验(HEC)。口服和经皮雌激素均使促黄体生成素(LH)显著降低至相同程度。经皮给予雌激素时平均GH无显著变化,但在口服雌激素治疗期间显著升高。雌激素治疗未改变口服葡萄糖耐量试验期间的血糖和胰岛素峰值及平均值,且两种治疗之间无显著差异。在治疗前及雌激素治疗期间进行的HEC中,平均血糖和胰岛素水平维持在相同水平。维持正常血糖所需的平均葡萄糖输注速率(平均值±标准误,治疗前,40.4±4.8微摩尔/千克·分钟)在口服(39.8±4.6微摩尔/千克·分钟)或经皮雌激素治疗(42.1±4.2微摩尔/千克·分钟)后未改变。然而,在经皮雌激素治疗阶段(60±10微摩尔/升),HEC期间平均非酯化游离脂肪酸浓度被抑制至显著低于口服雌激素治疗阶段(120±20微摩尔/升;P<0.05)的水平。我们得出结论,与口服途径相比,经皮雌激素治疗与胰岛素对脂质代谢的作用略有但显著改善相关。然而,短期内,雌激素替代疗法的给药途径对绝经后女性的葡萄糖代谢没有重大影响。