Hashmi A, Klassen T
Department of Pediatrics, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
J Emerg Med. 1995 Mar-Apr;13(2):255-8. doi: 10.1016/0736-4679(94)00152-9.
Controversy exists surrounding the appropriate indications for intravenous pyelography (IVP) in assessing blunt renal injuries in children. Forty-one consecutive cases of suspected blunt renal injuries, who had an IVP performed between January 1988 and December 1990 at The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, were examined by a retrospective chart review. Eighty percent of the IVPs were normal. Of the eight abnormal IVPs, four were contusions, two lacerations, and two nontraumatic abnormalities. There was no hemodynamic compromise, no requirement for surgical intervention, and no deaths in the study population. In the absence of significant hematuria (> or = 100 rbc/hpf), the probability of detecting a traumatic abnormality on IVP is low (4%). There was no correlation between the mechanism of injury and the IVP findings. We conclude that intravenous pyelography has a low yield in the absence of significant hematuria (> or = 100 rbc/hpf).
关于静脉肾盂造影(IVP)在评估儿童钝性肾损伤时的适当指征存在争议。对1988年1月至1990年12月在安大略东部儿童医院连续进行IVP检查的41例疑似钝性肾损伤患儿进行回顾性病历审查。80%的IVP检查结果正常。在8例异常IVP检查中,4例为挫伤,2例为撕裂伤,2例为非创伤性异常。研究人群中无血流动力学不稳定情况,无需手术干预,也无死亡病例。在无明显血尿(≥100个红细胞/高倍视野)的情况下,通过IVP检测到创伤性异常的概率较低(4%)。损伤机制与IVP检查结果之间无相关性。我们得出结论,在无明显血尿(≥100个红细胞/高倍视野)的情况下,静脉肾盂造影的阳性率较低。