Suppr超能文献

下段垂直子宫切口剖宫产术后试产:安全吗?

Trial of labor after cesarean delivery with a lower-segment, vertical uterine incision: is it safe?

作者信息

Naef R W, Ray M A, Chauhan S P, Roach H, Blake P G, Martin J N

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson 39216-4505, USA.

出版信息

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995 Jun;172(6):1666-73; discussion 1673-4. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(95)91398-x.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Our purpose was to assess maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor and attempted vaginal birth after prior low-segment vertical cesarean delivery.

STUDY DESIGN

During a 10-year period in a single tertiary hospital, all patients with a prior low-segment uterine incision (whether vertical or transverse) were considered candidates for a trial of labor in the absence of other contraindications or patient refusal. Among the 1137 women who underwent low-segment vertical cesarean delivery, 262 were subsequently delivered of 322 live-born infants, and 174 (54%) of them were identified retrospectively as having attempted vaginal birth. The maternal and perinatal outcomes of patients who did or did not undergo a trial of labor were analyzed and compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences between the two patient groups were observed regarding demographic characteristics, antepartum complications, gestational age at delivery (mean 37.4 weeks), birth weight, and cord pH at delivery. Vaginal delivery was accomplished successfully in 144 of 174 (83%) patients who underwent a trial of labor. Abdominal delivery was necessary for 17 mothers with labor disorders and 13 with suspected fetal distress. Postpartum hemorrhage occurred more often in the trial of labor group (7/174 [4.0%] vs 2/148 [1.4%], p not significant), but endometritis developed significantly more often in patients with elective repeat cesarean delivery (16.9% vs 6.3%, p = 0.006). Rupture of the low-segment vertical cesarean scar occurred in 2 patients during a trial of labor (1.1%) versus none in the elective repeat cesarean group. Neither mother experienced fetal extrusion or adverse maternal or fetal sequelae. Frequency of serious neonatal complications (8.1% vs 10%) and neonatal mortality (1.7% vs 2.0%) were similar between groups. All neonatal deaths were a result of extreme prematurity or congenital anomalies.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience indicates that a mother with a prior low-segment vertical cesarean delivery can undertake a trial of labor with relative maternal-perinatal safety. The likelihood of successful outcome and the incidence of complications are comparable to those of published experience with a trial of labor after a previous low-segment transverse incision.

摘要

目的

我们的目的是评估先前低位垂直剖宫产术后试产及阴道分娩尝试相关的孕产妇和围产期结局。

研究设计

在一家三级医院的10年期间,所有先前有低位子宫切口(无论是垂直还是横切口)的患者,在无其他禁忌证或患者拒绝的情况下,均被视为试产候选人。在1137例行低位垂直剖宫产的妇女中,262例随后分娩了322例活产婴儿,其中174例(54%)经回顾性确定曾尝试阴道分娩。对进行或未进行试产的患者的孕产妇和围产期结局进行了分析和比较。

结果

两组患者在人口统计学特征、产前并发症、分娩孕周(平均37.4周)、出生体重和分娩时脐动脉血pH值方面未观察到显著差异。174例接受试产的患者中有144例(83%)成功实现阴道分娩。17例有产程异常的母亲和13例怀疑胎儿窘迫的母亲需要行剖宫产。试产组产后出血更常见(7/174 [4.0%] 对比2/148 [1.4%],p值无统计学意义),但择期再次剖宫产患者子宫内膜炎发生率显著更高(16.9%对比6.3%,p = 0.006)。2例患者在试产期间发生低位垂直剖宫产瘢痕破裂(1.1%),择期再次剖宫产组无破裂发生。两位母亲均未发生胎儿娩出异常或母婴不良后遗症。两组严重新生儿并发症发生率(8.1%对比10%)和新生儿死亡率(1.7%对比2.0%)相似。所有新生儿死亡均因极度早产或先天性异常。

结论

我们的经验表明,先前有低位垂直剖宫产史的母亲可进行试产,且母婴相对安全。成功结局的可能性和并发症发生率与先前低位横切口剖宫产术后试产的已发表经验相当。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验