• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Evaluation of the E test method in the antimicrobial sensitivity of Neisseria meningitidis to penicillin].

作者信息

Gené A, Fortea J, Juncosa T, Muñoz C, Latorre C

机构信息

Servicio de Microbiología, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Esplugues, Barcelona.

出版信息

Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1995 May;13(5):283-7.

PMID:7779893
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The E test (AB Biodisk, Solna, Sweden) is a rather new method for performing antimicrobial susceptibility test--their results are generated directly as MICs. Due to its simplicity, is available in nearly all laboratories. The present study evaluates the effectiveness of the E test for susceptibility studies of Neisseria meningitidis to penicilline.

METHODS

The MICs of penicilline of 55 strains of Neisseria meningitidis, studied by E test and by microdilution method, were compared to those obtained by agar dilution using both Mueller-Hinton (MH) and Mueller-Hinton with a 5% of sheep blood (MH+S) as test culture bases.

RESULTS

The concordance rate (+/- 1 log2 of dilutions) was 100% in all cases, except for the E test on MH+S which yielded a 98.2% value. The Pearson's correlation coefficients were 0.95 and 0.84 for the E test and 0.88 and 0.85 for microdilution, using MH and MH+S. Roughly 70% of strains were considered susceptible to penicillin using MH for the in vitro tests, whereas only 40% of them were so considered using MH+S.

CONCLUSIONS

The E test can be considered a good alternative to agar dilution method when testing susceptibility of N. meningitidis to penicilline, and MH is the best culture base for these assays.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of the E test method in the antimicrobial sensitivity of Neisseria meningitidis to penicillin].
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1995 May;13(5):283-7.
2
[Usefulness of the disk diffusion method for evaluating the sensitivity of Neisseria meningitidis to penicillin and cefotaxime].[纸片扩散法评估脑膜炎奈瑟菌对青霉素和头孢噻肟敏感性的实用性]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1997 Dec;15(10):515-8.
3
Epidemiological survey of Neisseria meningitidis susceptibility to penicillin G in France.
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1997 Nov;45(9):729-36.
4
[Value of the E-test for the determination of the susceptibility to antibiotics of Neisseria meningitidis].
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1994 May;42(5):465-7.
5
[Standardization of the Neisseria meningitidis antibiogram. Detection of strains relatively resistant to penicillin].[脑膜炎奈瑟菌抗菌谱的标准化。对青霉素相对耐药菌株的检测]
Bull World Health Organ. 1998;76(4):393-400.
6
Have South Australian isolates of Neisseria meningitidis become less susceptible to penicillin, rifampicin and other drugs? A study of strains isolated over three decades, 1971-1999.南澳大利亚的脑膜炎奈瑟菌分离株对青霉素、利福平及其他药物的敏感性是否降低了?一项对1971年至1999年三十年间分离出的菌株的研究。
Pathology. 2004 Apr;36(2):160-5. doi: 10.1080/00313020410001672000.
7
Disk diffusion test and E-test with enriched Mueller-Hinton agar for determining susceptibility of Candida species to voriconazole and fluconazole.使用强化穆勒-欣顿琼脂进行纸片扩散试验和E试验,以确定念珠菌属对伏立康唑和氟康唑的敏感性。
J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2009 Apr;42(2):148-53.
8
E test as susceptibility test and epidemiologic tool for evaluation of Neisseria meningitidis isolates.E试验作为评估脑膜炎奈瑟菌分离株的药敏试验和流行病学工具。
J Clin Microbiol. 1993 Dec;31(12):3255-9. doi: 10.1128/jcm.31.12.3255-3259.1993.
9
E-test method of antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Neisseria gonorrhoeae for routine diagnostic service.用于常规诊断服务的淋病奈瑟菌抗菌药物敏感性试验的E-test法。
Afr J Med Med Sci. 2000 Jun;29(2):171-3.
10
Value of Etest penicillin V and penicillin G strips for penicillin susceptibility testing of Neisseria meningitidis.Etest青霉素V和青霉素G试纸条用于脑膜炎奈瑟菌青霉素敏感性检测的价值
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 2002 Jun;43(2):119-21. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(02)00386-3.