MacPhail R C, Berman E, Elder J A, Kavlock R J, Moser V C, Narotsky M G, Schlicht M
Neurotoxicology Division (MD-74B), Health Effects Research Laboratory, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, NC 27711, USA.
J Toxicol Environ Health. 1995 Jun;45(2):211-20. doi: 10.1080/15287399509531989.
Toxicity data collected under standardized test conditions may be of the utmost importance in health risk assessment, in which human exposure limits are often derived from laboratory experiments. A standardized approach to data collection is also important for evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of test methods used to determine toxic potential. Several experiments were undertaken to determine the effects of chemical exposures using a multidisciplinary screening battery, which included tests for systemic, neurological and developmental toxicity. The effects of 1- and 14-d exposures to 10 chemicals on systemic and neurological indices of toxicity were determined in female F344 rats using standardized test batteries. Parallel experiments determined chemical effects on prenatal and postnatal development following exposure of the dams for 14 d. The chemicals included four pesticides (carbaryl, triadimefon, chlordane, and heptachlor), four solvents (trichloroethylene, tetrachloroethylene, carbon tetrachloride, and dichloromethane), and two industrial compounds (phenol and diethylhexyl phthalate). The results showed that the chemicals produced markedly different qualitative patterns of effect on systemic, neurological, and developmental indices of toxicity. Differences in the pattern of systemic and neurological effects were also obtained that depended on dosing duration. Quantitative analyses indicated that the highest ineffective dose as well as the lowest effective dose could vary by as much as two orders of magnitude across the different indices of toxicity. These results clearly show that a test battery focused on a single endpoint of toxicity cannot be used to accurately predict either qualitatively or quantitatively a chemical's systemic, neurological, and developmental toxicity profile.
在标准化测试条件下收集的毒性数据在健康风险评估中可能至关重要,因为人类接触限值通常源自实验室实验。标准化的数据收集方法对于评估用于确定毒性潜力的测试方法的敏感性和特异性也很重要。进行了多项实验,以使用多学科筛选组合来确定化学物质暴露的影响,该组合包括全身、神经和发育毒性测试。使用标准化测试组合,在雌性F344大鼠中确定了10种化学物质1天和14天暴露对全身和神经毒性指标的影响。平行实验确定了在母鼠暴露14天后化学物质对产前和产后发育的影响。这些化学物质包括四种农药(西维因、三唑酮、氯丹和七氯)、四种溶剂(三氯乙烯、四氯乙烯、四氯化碳和二氯甲烷)以及两种工业化合物(苯酚和邻苯二甲酸二乙基己酯)。结果表明,这些化学物质对全身、神经和发育毒性指标产生了明显不同的定性影响模式。还获得了全身和神经效应模式的差异,这取决于给药持续时间。定量分析表明,在不同的毒性指标中,最高无效剂量以及最低有效剂量可能相差多达两个数量级。这些结果清楚地表明,专注于单一毒性终点的测试组合不能用于准确地定性或定量预测化学物质的全身、神经和发育毒性概况。