Jones R L, Neary J M, Man G C, Ryan T G
Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Respiration. 1995;62(2):70-5. doi: 10.1159/000196394.
The hypercapnic ventilation response (HCVR) is positively correlated with forced expired volume in 1 s (FEV1). Therefore, subjects of small stature or patients with lung disease have low values for HCVR. However, indexing the HCVR for the subject's predicted maximal voluntary ventilation (MVV) results in a corrected HCVR (CHCVR) which is not dependent on FEV1 in normal subjects [Respiration 1993;60:197-202]. We hypothesized that the CHCVR would also be useful in assessing chemosensitivity in patients with poor lung function. To obtain the predicted MVV, we used the linear regression for FEV1 vs. measured MVV obtained from 411 patients with a wide range of FEV1 values (MVV = 31.2 x FEV1 + 11.8, r = 0.90, p < 0.001). We compared HCVR and CHCVR to the occlusion pressure response to hypercapnia (OPRH) in 34 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and in 19 patients with low FEV1 due to small stature. All patients had been referred for assessment of possible sleep apnea. The results for the two groups of patients were similar. For the COPD patients, the HCVR had high values for sensitivity (86%) and negative predictive value (94%), but specificity, positive predictive value and accuracy were low (59, 35 and 65%, respectively). In contrast, CHCVR had high values for all the foregoing (86, 96, 100, 100 and 97%, respectively). Our results suggest that the CHCVR is useful in assessing chemosensitivity in patients who are ventilation-limited.
高碳酸通气反应(HCVR)与1秒用力呼气量(FEV1)呈正相关。因此,身材矮小的受试者或患有肺部疾病的患者HCVR值较低。然而,将HCVR根据受试者预测的最大自主通气量(MVV)进行校正,可得到校正后的HCVR(CHCVR),在正常受试者中,CHCVR不依赖于FEV1[《呼吸》1993年;60:197 - 202]。我们假设CHCVR在评估肺功能差的患者的化学敏感性方面也会有用。为了获得预测的MVV,我们对411例FEV1值范围广泛的患者(MVV = 31.2×FEV1 + 11.8,r = 0.90,p < 0.001)的FEV1与实测MVV进行线性回归分析。我们比较了34例慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者和19例因身材矮小导致FEV1低的患者的HCVR和CHCVR与高碳酸血症的闭塞压反应(OPRH)。所有患者均因可能的睡眠呼吸暂停而被转诊进行评估。两组患者的结果相似。对于COPD患者,HCVR的敏感性(86%)和阴性预测值(94%)较高,但特异性、阳性预测值和准确性较低(分别为59%、35%和65%)。相比之下,CHCVR在上述各项指标中均较高(分别为86%、96%、100%、100%和97%)。我们的结果表明,CHCVR在评估通气受限患者的化学敏感性方面是有用的。