Misleading meta-analysis. Variability among studies should be investigated.
作者信息
Perry A, Persaud R
出版信息
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1604a.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Misleading meta-analysis. Variability among studies should be investigated.误导性的荟萃分析。应调查各研究之间的差异。
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1604a.
2
Misleading meta-analysis. Registers for clinical trials already exist.
BMJ. 1995 Jun 17;310(6994):1604. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6994.1604.
3
A generalized formula for converting chi-square tests to effect sizes for meta-analysis.用于将卡方检验转换为荟萃分析效应量的通用公式。
PLoS One. 2010 Apr 7;5(4):e10059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010059.
4
Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analyses--sometimes informative, usually misleading.荟萃分析得出的需治疗人数——有时提供信息，通常具有误导性。
BMJ. 1999 Jun 5;318(7197):1548-51. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1548.
5
Numbers needed to treat derived from meta-analysis. Using patient years may also be misleading.从荟萃分析得出的需治疗人数。使用患者年数也可能产生误导。
BMJ. 1999 Oct 30;319(7218):1199-200.
6
Con: Meta-analysis: some key limitations and potential solutions.反对观点：荟萃分析：一些关键局限性及潜在解决方案。
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2016 Jun;31(6):882-5. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw092.
7
The simplest statistical test: how to check for a difference between treatments.最简单的统计检验：如何检验治疗方法之间的差异。
BMJ. 2006 May 27;332(7552):1256-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.332.7552.1256.
8
On pooled and stratified analysis of epidemiologic rates.关于流行病学率的汇总和分层分析。
Public Health Rev. 1988;16(3-4):163-87.
9
The use of numbers needed to treat derived from systematic reviews and meta-analysis. Caveats and pitfalls.从系统评价和荟萃分析得出的需治疗人数的应用。注意事项和陷阱。
Eval Health Prof. 2001 Jun;24(2):152-64. doi: 10.1177/01632780122034858.
10
The relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis.荟萃分析中治疗获益与潜在风险之间的关系。
BMJ. 1996 Sep 21;313(7059):735-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7059.735.
引用本文的文献
1
Misleading meta-analysis. "Fail safe N" is a useful mathematical measure of the stability of results.
BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):125. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7023.125.
2
Misleading meta-analysis.误导性的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 1995 Sep 16;311(7007):753-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.311.7007.753c.
本文引用的文献
1
Efficacy of tricyclic drugs in treating child and adolescent depression: a meta-analysis.三环类药物治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症的疗效：一项荟萃分析。
BMJ. 1995 Apr 8;310(6984):897-901. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6984.897.
2
Misleading meta-analysis.误导性的荟萃分析。
BMJ. 1995 Mar 25;310(6982):752-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.310.6982.752.
Zotero 插件