• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

根据静脉葡萄糖耐量试验C肽数据估算β细胞敏感性。了解动力学可避免在分泌建模中出现误差。

Estimation of beta-cell sensitivity from intravenous glucose tolerance test C-peptide data. Knowledge of the kinetics avoids errors in modeling the secretion.

作者信息

Toffolo G, De Grandi F, Cobelli C

机构信息

Department of Electronics and Informatics, University of Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Diabetes. 1995 Jul;44(7):845-54. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.7.845.

DOI:10.2337/diab.44.7.845
PMID:7789653
Abstract

Parametric models of insulin secretion are used to measure indexes of beta-cell function from plasma C-peptide concentration during an intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT). Since the models have been usually assessed against plasma C-peptide data, both secretory and kinetic parameters need to be simultaneously estimated. However, undesired compensations between the two sets of parameters may arise. In this study, in order to evaluate IVGTT insulin secretion models, we have analyzed IVGTT data from seven normal subjects for whom individual C-peptide kinetics were known from a separate experiment. Three different beta-cell models have been examined: the minimal model M1 (Diabetes 37:223-231, 1988); a variation of a published model, M2 (Math Biosci 27:319-332, 1975); and a new one, M3. A two-compartment model was used to describe C-peptide kinetics. The results suggest the inadequacy of M1 since kinetic parameter estimates were consistently biased versus the known individual values, and systematic errors were present in the prediction of C-peptide data when kinetic parameters were fixed to the known individual values. M2 performs better than M1 since it reproduces C-peptide data satisfactorily when the individually known description of the kinetics is adopted. M3 retains the second-phase description of M2 but improves the description of first-phase release. M3 is thus proposed to reconstruct the insulin secretion time course and to estimate parameters of first- and second-phase sensitivity to glucose. We also show the robustness of M3, i.e., standard values of C-peptide kinetic parameters can be used when individual values are not available without a loss of accuracy in the estimated secretion parameters. Finally, the shortcomings of using a simplified single-compartment description of C-peptide kinetics are discussed.

摘要

胰岛素分泌的参数模型用于通过静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT)期间的血浆C肽浓度来测量β细胞功能指标。由于这些模型通常是根据血浆C肽数据进行评估的,因此分泌参数和动力学参数都需要同时进行估计。然而,两组参数之间可能会出现不期望的补偿情况。在本研究中,为了评估IVGTT胰岛素分泌模型,我们分析了来自7名正常受试者的IVGTT数据,这些受试者的个体C肽动力学在另一个单独的实验中是已知的。我们研究了三种不同的β细胞模型:最小模型M1(《糖尿病》37:223 - 231, 1988);已发表模型的一个变体M2(《数学生物科学》27:319 - 332, 1975);以及一个新模型M3。采用两室模型来描述C肽动力学。结果表明M1存在不足,因为动力学参数估计值与已知的个体值相比始终存在偏差,并且当将动力学参数固定为已知个体值时,在C肽数据预测中存在系统误差。M2比M1表现更好,因为当采用个体已知的动力学描述时,它能令人满意地重现C肽数据。M3保留了M2的第二阶段描述,但改进了第一阶段释放的描述。因此,建议使用M3来重建胰岛素分泌时间进程,并估计对葡萄糖的第一阶段和第二阶段敏感性参数。我们还展示了M3的稳健性,即当没有个体值时,可以使用C肽动力学参数的标准值,而不会损失估计分泌参数的准确性。最后,讨论了使用简化的单室C肽动力学描述的缺点。

相似文献

1
Estimation of beta-cell sensitivity from intravenous glucose tolerance test C-peptide data. Knowledge of the kinetics avoids errors in modeling the secretion.根据静脉葡萄糖耐量试验C肽数据估算β细胞敏感性。了解动力学可避免在分泌建模中出现误差。
Diabetes. 1995 Jul;44(7):845-54. doi: 10.2337/diab.44.7.845.
2
Beta-cell function during insulin-modified intravenous glucose tolerance test successfully assessed by the C-peptide minimal model.通过C肽最小模型成功评估胰岛素改良静脉葡萄糖耐量试验期间的β细胞功能。
Metabolism. 1999 Sep;48(9):1162-6. doi: 10.1016/s0026-0495(99)90132-4.
3
Quantification of beta-cell function during IVGTT in Type II and non-diabetic subjects: assessment of insulin secretion by mathematical methods.II型糖尿病患者和非糖尿病受试者静脉葡萄糖耐量试验期间β细胞功能的量化:通过数学方法评估胰岛素分泌
Diabetologia. 2001 Oct;44(10):1339-48. doi: 10.1007/s001250100639.
4
Epinephrine exerts opposite effects on peripheral glucose disposal and glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. A stable label intravenous glucose tolerance test minimal model study.肾上腺素对外周葡萄糖处置和葡萄糖刺激的胰岛素分泌具有相反的作用。一项稳定标记静脉葡萄糖耐量试验最小模型研究。
Diabetes. 1996 Oct;45(10):1373-8. doi: 10.2337/diab.45.10.1373.
5
Prehepatic beta-cell secretion during the intravenous glucose tolerance test in humans: application of a combined model of insulin and C-peptide kinetics.人类静脉葡萄糖耐量试验期间肝前β细胞分泌:胰岛素和C肽动力学联合模型的应用
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1989 Oct;69(4):790-7. doi: 10.1210/jcem-69-4-790.
6
Insulin minimal model indexes and secretion: proper handling of uncertainty by a Bayesian approach.胰岛素最小模型指标与分泌:采用贝叶斯方法对不确定性进行恰当处理
Ann Biomed Eng. 2004 Jul;32(7):1027-37. doi: 10.1023/b:abme.0000032465.75888.91.
7
Estimation of insulin secretion rates from C-peptide levels. Comparison of individual and standard kinetic parameters for C-peptide clearance.根据C肽水平估算胰岛素分泌率。C肽清除个体动力学参数与标准动力学参数的比较。
Diabetes. 1992 Mar;41(3):368-77. doi: 10.2337/diab.41.3.368.
8
Quantitative indexes of beta-cell function during graded up&down glucose infusion from C-peptide minimal models.基于C肽最小模型的葡萄糖分级输注期间β细胞功能的定量指标。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2001 Jan;280(1):E2-10. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.2001.280.1.E2.
9
Evaluation of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell function indexes obtained from minimal model analysis of a meal tolerance test.通过对口服糖耐量试验进行最小模型分析得出的胰岛素敏感性和β细胞功能指标的评估。
Diabetes. 2004 May;53(5):1201-7. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.53.5.1201.
10
Accurate measurement of endogenous insulin secretion does not require separate assessment of C-peptide kinetics.内源性胰岛素分泌的准确测量并不需要单独评估C肽动力学。
Diabetes. 2000 Mar;49(3):373-82. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.49.3.373.

引用本文的文献

1
Immune-evasive beta cells in type 1 diabetes: innovations in genetic engineering, biomaterials, and computational modeling.1型糖尿病中具有免疫逃逸能力的β细胞:基因工程、生物材料和计算建模的创新
Front Immunol. 2025 Aug 19;16:1618086. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1618086. eCollection 2025.
2
A mathematical model for ketosis-prone diabetes suggests the existence of multiple pancreatic β-cell inactivation mechanisms.一种针对酮症倾向型糖尿病的数学模型表明存在多种胰腺β细胞失活机制。
Elife. 2025 Jul 15;13:RP100193. doi: 10.7554/eLife.100193.
3
Elevated Fasting C-Peptide Levels Correlate with Increased 10-Year Risk of Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease in Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients.
空腹C肽水平升高与新诊断2型糖尿病患者10年动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病风险增加相关。
Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2025 Jan 6;18:51-59. doi: 10.2147/DMSO.S497309. eCollection 2025.
4
A mathematical model for ketosis-prone diabetes suggests the existence of multiple pancreatic β-cell inactivation mechanisms.一种针对酮症倾向型糖尿病的数学模型表明存在多种胰腺β细胞失活机制。
bioRxiv. 2024 Jun 6:2024.06.04.597343. doi: 10.1101/2024.06.04.597343.
5
Circulating total and H-specific GDF15 levels are elevated in subjects with MASLD but not in hyperlipidemic but otherwise metabolically healthy subjects with obesity.在 MASLD 患者中,循环总 GDF15 和 H 特异性 GDF15 水平升高,但在高脂血症但其他代谢健康的肥胖患者中则没有。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2024 May 18;23(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12933-024-02264-5.
6
Increased Insulin Secretion and Glucose Effectiveness in Obese Patients with Type 2 Diabetes following Bariatric Surgery.肥胖 2 型糖尿病患者行减重手术后胰岛素分泌增加和葡萄糖作用增强。
J Diabetes Res. 2023 Nov 14;2023:7127426. doi: 10.1155/2023/7127426. eCollection 2023.
7
Suppression of Endogenous Insulin Secretion by Euglycemic Hyperinsulinemia.正常血糖高胰岛素血症抑制内源性胰岛素分泌。
J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2024 Jan 18;109(2):e596-e601. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgad563.
8
Alterations of glycaemia, insulin resistance and body mass index within the C-peptide optimal range in non-diabetic patients.非糖尿病患者 C 肽最佳范围内的血糖、胰岛素抵抗和体重指数的变化。
J Appl Biomed. 2020 Dec;18(4):136-142. doi: 10.32725/jab.2020.018. Epub 2020 Dec 8.
9
Minimal and Maximal Models to Quantitate Glucose Metabolism: Tools to Measure, to Simulate and to Run in Silico Clinical Trials.最小和最大模型量化葡萄糖代谢:用于测量、模拟和进行临床前临床试验的工具。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1270-1298. doi: 10.1177/19322968211015268. Epub 2021 May 25.
10
Assessment of individual and standardized glucagon kinetics in healthy humans.健康人体中个体和标准化胰高血糖素动力学的评估。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jan 1;320(1):E71-E77. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00488.2020. Epub 2020 Nov 2.