Department of Woman and Child's Health University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
Department of Information Engineering, University of Padova, Padova, Italy.
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1270-1298. doi: 10.1177/19322968211015268. Epub 2021 May 25.
Several models have been proposed to describe the glucose system at whole-body, organ/tissue and cellular level, designed to measure non-accessible parameters (minimal models), to simulate system behavior and run in silico clinical trials (maximal models). Here, we will review the authors' work, by putting it into a concise historical background. We will discuss first the parametric portrait provided by the -building on the classical intravenous glucose tolerance test minimal models-to measure otherwise non-accessible key parameters like insulin sensitivity and beta-cell responsivity from a physiological oral test, the mixed meal or the oral glucose tolerance tests, and what can be gained by adding a tracer to the oral glucose dose. These models were used in various pathophysiological studies, which we will briefly review. A deeper understanding of insulin sensitivity can be gained by measuring insulin action in the skeletal muscle. This requires the use of isotopic tracers: both the classical multiple-tracer dilution and the positron emission tomography techniques are discussed, which quantitate the effect of insulin on the individual steps of glucose metabolism, that is, bidirectional transport plasma-interstitium, and phosphorylation. Finally, we will present a cellular model of insulin secretion that, using a multiscale modeling approach, highlights the relations between minimal model indices and subcellular secretory events. In terms of , we will move from a parametric to a flux portrait of the system by discussing the triple tracer meal protocol implemented with the tracer-to-tracee clamp technique. This allows to arrive at quasi-model independent measurement of glucose rate of appearance (Ra), endogenous glucose production (EGP), and glucose rate of disappearance (Rd). Both the fast absorbing simple carbs and the slow absorbing complex carbs are discussed. This rich data base has allowed us to build the UVA/Padova Type 1 diabetes and the Padova Type 2 diabetes large scale simulators. In particular, the UVA/Padova Type 1 simulator proved to be a very useful tool to safely and effectively test in silico closed-loop control algorithms for an artificial pancreas (AP). This was the first and unique simulator of the glucose system accepted by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a substitute to animal trials for in silico testing AP algorithms. Recent uses of the simulator have looked at glucose sensors for non-adjunctive use and new insulin molecules.
已经提出了几种模型来描述全身、器官/组织和细胞水平的葡萄糖系统,旨在测量不可访问的参数(最小模型),模拟系统行为并进行计算机临床试验(最大模型)。在这里,我们将通过简洁的历史背景来回顾作者的工作。我们将首先讨论 - 基于经典的静脉葡萄糖耐量试验最小模型 - 从生理学口服测试(混合餐或口服葡萄糖耐量试验)中测量其他不可访问的关键参数,如胰岛素敏感性和β细胞反应性的参数肖像,并讨论从口服葡萄糖剂量中添加示踪剂可以获得什么。这些模型已在各种病理生理学研究中得到应用,我们将简要回顾这些研究。通过测量骨骼肌中的胰岛素作用,可以更深入地了解胰岛素敏感性。这需要使用同位素示踪剂:我们将讨论经典的多示踪剂稀释和正电子发射断层扫描技术,这些技术定量测量胰岛素对葡萄糖代谢各个步骤的作用,即血浆-间质的双向转运,以及磷酸化。最后,我们将展示一个胰岛素分泌的细胞模型,该模型使用多尺度建模方法,突出了最小模型指数与亚细胞分泌事件之间的关系。在方法方面,我们将通过讨论使用示踪剂-示踪剂钳技术实施的三重示踪剂餐方案,从参数肖像转向通量肖像。这允许准模型独立地测量葡萄糖出现率(Ra)、内源性葡萄糖产生(EGP)和葡萄糖消失率(Rd)。我们讨论了快速吸收的简单碳水化合物和缓慢吸收的复杂碳水化合物。这个丰富的数据库使我们能够构建 UVA/Padova 1 型糖尿病和 Padova 2 型糖尿病的大规模模拟器。特别是,UVA/Padova 1 型模拟器被证明是一种非常有用的工具,可以安全有效地在计算机上测试人工胰腺(AP)的闭环控制算法。这是第一个也是唯一的接受美国食品和药物管理局作为动物试验替代物的葡萄糖系统模拟器,用于计算机测试 AP 算法。最近,该模拟器用于研究非辅助使用的葡萄糖传感器和新型胰岛素分子。