Bates D W, Cullen D J, Laird N, Petersen L A, Small S D, Servi D, Laffel G, Sweitzer B J, Shea B F, Hallisey R
Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
JAMA. 1995 Jul 5;274(1):29-34.
To assess incidence and preventability of adverse drug events (ADEs) and potential ADEs. To analyze preventable events to develop prevention strategies.
Prospective cohort study.
All 4031 adult admissions to a stratified random sample of 11 medical and surgical units in two tertiary care hospitals over a 6-month period. Units included two medical and three surgical intensive care units and four medical and two surgical general care units.
Adverse drug events and potential ADEs.
Incidents were detected by stimulated self-report by nurses and pharmacists and by daily review of all charts by nurse investigators. Incidents were subsequently classified by two independent reviewers as to whether they represented ADEs or potential ADEs and as to severity and preventability.
Over 6 months, 247 ADEs and 194 potential ADEs were identified. Extrapolated event rates were 6.5 ADEs and 5.5 potential ADEs per 100 nonobstetrical admissions, for mean numbers per hospital per year of approximately 1900 ADEs and 1600 potential ADEs. Of all ADEs, 1% were fatal (none preventable), 12% life-threatening, 30% serious, and 57% significant. Twenty-eight percent were judged preventable. Of the life-threatening and serious ADEs, 42% were preventable, compared with 18% of significant ADEs. Errors resulting in preventable ADEs occurred most often at the stages of ordering (56%) and administration (34%); transcription (6%) and dispensing errors (4%) were less common. Errors were much more likely to be intercepted if the error occurred earlier in the process: 48% at the ordering stage vs 0% at the administration stage.
Adverse drug events were common and often preventable; serious ADEs were more likely to be preventable. Most resulted from errors at the ordering stage, but many also occurred at the administration stage. Prevention strategies should target both stages of the drug delivery process.
评估药物不良事件(ADEs)和潜在药物不良事件的发生率及可预防性。分析可预防事件以制定预防策略。
前瞻性队列研究。
在6个月期间,对两家三级护理医院11个内科和外科科室的分层随机样本中的所有4031例成年住院患者进行研究。这些科室包括两个内科重症监护病房、三个外科重症监护病房、四个内科普通病房和两个外科普通病房。
药物不良事件和潜在药物不良事件。
通过护士和药剂师的主动自我报告以及护士调查员对所有病历的每日审查来发现事件。随后,由两名独立的评审员将事件分类为是否属于药物不良事件或潜在药物不良事件,以及严重程度和可预防性。
在6个月期间,共识别出247例药物不良事件和194例潜在药物不良事件。推算出的事件发生率为每100例非产科住院患者中有6.5例药物不良事件和5.5例潜在药物不良事件,每家医院每年的平均事件数约为1900例药物不良事件和1600例潜在药物不良事件。在所有药物不良事件中,1%是致命的(均不可预防),12%危及生命,30%严重,57%显著。28%被判定为可预防。在危及生命和严重的药物不良事件中,42%是可预防的,而在显著的药物不良事件中这一比例为18%。导致可预防药物不良事件的错误最常发生在医嘱开具(56%)和给药(34%)阶段;转录错误(6%)和调配错误(4%)较少见。如果错误发生在流程的早期,则更有可能被拦截:医嘱开具阶段为48%,而给药阶段为0%。
药物不良事件很常见,且通常可预防;严重的药物不良事件更有可能可预防。大多数药物不良事件是由医嘱开具阶段的错误导致的,但也有许多发生在给药阶段。预防策略应针对药物输送过程的两个阶段。