Suppr超能文献

住院成人药物不良事件的发生率及可预防性

Incidence and preventability of adverse drug events in hospitalized adults.

作者信息

Bates D W, Leape L L, Petrycki S

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 1993 Jun;8(6):289-94. doi: 10.1007/BF02600138.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and preventability of adverse drug events (ADEs) and to determine the yield of several strategies for identifying them.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Seven units, including two medical, two surgical, and two obstetric general care units and a coronary intensive care unit in an urban tertiary care hospital.

PATIENTS

All patients on these units over a 37-day period (2,967 patient-days).

INTERVENTION

None.

METHODS

Events were identified in three ways: 1) logs were placed on each unit and satellite pharmacy for nurses and pharmacists to record incidents; 2) a research nurse solicited reports of incidents twice daily on each unit; and 3) the nurse reviewed all charts at least daily. Incidents were classified by two independent reviewers as ADEs or potential ADEs.

RESULTS

The rate of drug-related incidents was 73 in 2,967 patient-days; 27 incidents were judged ADEs, 34 potential ADEs, and 12 problem orders. Fifty different drugs were involved. Physicians were primarily responsible for 72% of the incidents, with the remainder divided evenly between nursing, pharmacy, and clerical personnel. Of the 27 ADEs, five were life-threatening, nine were serious, and 13 were significant. Fifteen (56%) of the 27 were judged definitely or probably preventable. Incidents were discovered about equally often from the logs and by chart review. However, when the incidents in which an ADE was present were compared with the remainder of incidents, the authors found that 67% (18 of 27) of the ADEs were identified only by chart review (p < 0.001), and physicians were more often judged responsible than other personnel (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The authors conclude that ADEs are not infrequent, often preventable, and usually caused by physician decisions. In this study, solicited reporting by nurses and pharmacists was inferior to chart review for identifying ADEs, but was effective for identifying potential ADEs. Optimal prevention strategies should cover many types of drugs and target physicians' ordering practices.

摘要

目的

评估药物不良事件(ADEs)的发生率及可预防性,并确定几种识别药物不良事件策略的成效。

设计

前瞻性队列研究。

地点

一家城市三级护理医院的七个科室,包括两个内科、两个外科、两个产科普通护理科室以及一个冠心病重症监护病房。

患者

这些科室在37天内的所有患者(共2967个患者日)。

干预措施

无。

方法

通过三种方式识别事件:1)在每个科室和卫星药房放置日志,供护士和药剂师记录事件;2)一名研究护士每天在每个科室两次征集事件报告;3)护士至少每天查阅所有病历。由两名独立评审员将事件分类为药物不良事件或潜在药物不良事件。

结果

在2967个患者日中,与药物相关的事件发生率为73起;27起事件被判定为药物不良事件,34起为潜在药物不良事件,12起为问题医嘱。涉及50种不同药物。医生对72%的事件负主要责任,其余责任在护理人员、药剂师和文书人员之间平均分配。在27起药物不良事件中,5起危及生命,9起严重,13起显著。27起事件中有15起(56%)被判定肯定或可能可预防。通过日志和病历审查发现事件的频率大致相同。然而,当将存在药物不良事件的事件与其余事件进行比较时,作者发现67%(27起中的18起)的药物不良事件仅通过病历审查得以识别(p < 0.001),且医生比其他人员更常被判定负有责任(p < 0.001)。

结论

作者得出结论,药物不良事件并不罕见,通常可预防,且通常由医生的决策导致。在本研究中,护士和药剂师主动报告在识别药物不良事件方面不如病历审查,但在识别潜在药物不良事件方面有效。最佳预防策略应涵盖多种类型的药物,并针对医生的开医嘱行为。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验