Suppr超能文献

使用多种数据源在发病率测量和风险因素识别方面的差异:以冠心病为例。

Differences in morbidity measures and risk factor identification using multiple data sources: the case of coronary heart disease.

作者信息

Madans J H, Reuben C A, Rothwell S T, Eberhardt M S

机构信息

Office of Analysis and Epidemiology, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD 20782, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1995;14(5-7):643-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.4780140521.

Abstract

The NHANES I Epidemiologic Followup Study contains several sources of information that can be used to define case status. Incidence rates and relative risks associated with selected, documented risk factors for heart disease were estimated using nine different case definitions. Despite wide variation in the estimates of incidence, the characteristics of the cases were remarkably similar as were the risks associated with heart disease incidence. The main difference occurred when cases were defined on the basis of death certificate information. Cases defined this way are more severe and models based on this definition result in relative risks of greater magnitude.

摘要

美国国家健康与营养检查调查一期流行病学随访研究包含多个可用于定义病例状态的信息来源。使用九种不同的病例定义对与选定的、有记录的心脏病风险因素相关的发病率和相对风险进行了估计。尽管发病率估计值差异很大,但病例的特征以及与心脏病发病率相关的风险却非常相似。主要差异出现在根据死亡证明信息定义病例时。以这种方式定义的病例更为严重,基于此定义的模型会得出更大幅度的相对风险。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验